首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
游客
2024-08-03
43
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] In Denmark, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor because______.
选项
A、the level of income disparity is relatively low
B、the purpose of taxing is to improve economy
C、the taxes aim at softening the shock of climate change
D、the taxes make products more expensive
答案
A
解析
由题干中的effects of health taxes,less hard on the poor定位到第四段第二句。该句指出因为丹麦收入差异相对较低,因此健康税对穷人的影响比其他国家小,由此可见A)最恰当。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3703499.html
相关试题推荐
WhatdowelearnaboutDenmark’senergyproject?[originaltext]Denmarkhascome
[originaltext]Fallingticketpricesandrisingincomesareleadingtorapid
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
随机试题
Afriendofmine,inresponsetoaconversationwewerehavingabouttheinj
Wearesatisfiedwiththetermsofthiscontractforthemostpart,butwefeelt
C将直线写成参数方程后求解
骨与关节结核病因及病理哪项是不正确的A.股骨干血运差,易发生皮质骨结核 B.9
倒闸操作应尽量避免()等情况时进行交接班$;$高峰负荷$;$异常运行$;$恶劣
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
下列属于首次放款的先决条件文件的有()。A.与项目有关的协议 B.贷款类文件
根据《中华人民共和国环境保护法》的规定,环境影响报告书应在建设项目的哪一阶段报批
多机松散结构各计算机间的数据传递依靠()。A、活动硬盘 B、数据连线 C、无
女,16岁。被侧塌的房屋压伤后腹痛伴呕吐1小时。查体:P140次/分,R26
最新回复
(
0
)