首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
游客
2024-08-03
24
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] In the author’s opinion, what is the purpose of Denmark’s exerting "fat tax"?
选项
A、To attract public advocates.
B、To set up a nanny-state.
C、To stave off rising obesity rates.
D、To change medical conditions.
答案
C
解析
根据题干中的“fat tax”定位到第一段第三句。本句提出目前丹麦政府因征收“肥胖税”而变得臭名昭著,并已经引起国际骚动,毁誉参半。第二段首句则指出作者认为它是一个国家想降低日益增长的肥胖率的尝试。it指上一段提出的“肥胖税”,因此C)最合理。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3703496.html
相关试题推荐
WhatdowelearnaboutDenmark’senergyproject?[originaltext]Denmarkhascome
[originaltext]Fallingticketpricesandrisingincomesareleadingtorapid
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
随机试题
Greatemployeesaredependable,diligent,greatleadersandgreatfollowers.
农村居民接受转让,购买房屋取得的宅基地,与原有宅基地合计面积超过当地政府规定标准
材料预算价格是指材料从来源地到达( )的价格。A.工地 B.施工操作地点
统计学上认为()A.两总体均数差别有显著性 B.两样本均数差别无显著性 C.
患者,女性,60岁。毕Ⅱ式胃大部切除术后1年,上腹持续性烧灼痛,服用抗酸药无效;
下列关于人体细胞生物膜系统的叙述,不正确的是()。A.成熟红细胞的膜系统简单
2011年我国全年货物进出口总额36421亿美元,比上年增长22.5%。其中,
A.二甲硅油B.聚乙烯醇C.可可豆脂D.胆固醇E.EUDRAGIT包肠溶衣的材料
关于泌尿系结石的治疗,不正确的是 A.碱化尿液有助于胱氨酸结石的溶解B.酸化
小学生的伦理道德发展的基木特征之一是可以做到言行一致,其有()性。
最新回复
(
0
)