首页
登录
职称英语
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We’re push
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We’re push
游客
2024-06-17
29
管理
问题
In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We’re pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT prep courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. We say our motives are selfless and sensible. A degree from Stanford or Princeton is the ticket for life. If Aaron and Nicole don’t get in, they’re forever doomed.
I’ve twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. It’s one-upmanship(能超越别人的本事) among parents. We see our kids’ college pedigrees(门第,出身) as trophies attesting to how well—or how poorly—we’ve raised them. But we can’t acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them.
It’s true that getting into college has generally become tougher because the number of high-school graduates has grown. We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won’t be enough trophies to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever.
Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that’s plausible—and mostly wrong. Selective schools don’t systematically employ better instructional approaches than less-selective schools, according to a study. On two measures—professors’ feedback and the number of essay exams—selective schools do slightly worse.
By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates’ lifetime earnings. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke(侥幸的成功). A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as much as graduates from higher-status schools.
Kids count more than their colleges. Getting into Yale may signify intelligence, talent and ambition. But it’s nor the only indicator and, paradoxically, its significance is declining. The reason: so many similar people go elsewhere. Getting into college isn’t life’s only competition. In the next competition—the job market, graduate school—the results may change.
So, parents, lighten up. The stakes have been vastly exaggerated. Up to a point, we can rationalize our pushiness. America is a competitive society; our kids need to adjust to that. But too much pushiness can be destructive. The very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment.
选项
答案
ticket for life/key to success
解析
由题干中的diploma,Stanford和Princeton定位到文章首段倒数第2句A degree from Stanford or Princeton is the ticket for life.此处需要填入名词性成分,与as一起作regard的宾语补足语.其结构为regard sth.as sth.表示“把…看作”。题目中的diploma与文中的degree近义,根据题意应填入ticket for life/key to success。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3637505.html
相关试题推荐
ParentstendtoregardthediplomafromStanfordorPrincetonasthe______.[br]
ParentstendtoregardthediplomafromStanfordorPrincetonasthe______.[br]
ParentstendtoregardthediplomafromStanfordorPrincetonasthe______.[br]
ParentstendtoregardthediplomafromStanfordorPrincetonasthe______.[br]
Inthecollege-admissionswars,weparentsarethetruefighters.We’repush
Personalityistoalargeextentinherent—Atypeparentsusuallybringabout
Personalityistoalargeextentinherent—Atypeparentsusuallybringabout
Personalityistoalargeextentinherent—Atypeparentsusuallybringabout
Personalityistoalargeextentinherent—Atypeparentsusuallybringabout
Personalityistoalargeextentinherent—Atypeparentsusuallybringabout
随机试题
Thegrandmotherdidn’twanttogotoFlorida.Shewantedtovisitsomeofhe
Whatdothebee’srounddanceandtail-waggingdanceindicate?[originaltext]
Inthissection,youwillhearashortpassage.Forquestions21—30,completeth
关于垄断竞争市场的说法,正确的有( )。 Ⅰ企业的需求曲线就是行业的需求
共用题干 杨先生今年45岁,打算60岁退休,考虑到通货膨胀,退休后每年生活费需
某医院原计划采购普通医用口罩和N95口罩共480箱,采购时因为供货量的问题,将的
下列哪项不是通过改变有效滤过压来影响肾小球滤过率? A.血容量减少B.输尿管
从装满1000克浓度为50%的酒精瓶中倒出200克酒精,再倒入蒸馏水将瓶加满。这
关于吗啡的叙述,错误的是A.具有吲哚环结构的生物碱,是由4个环稠合而成的复杂立体
A. B. C. D.
最新回复
(
0
)