首页
登录
职称英语
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slippin
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slippin
游客
2024-06-02
32
管理
问题
It’s a rough world out there. Step outside and you could break a leg slipping on your doormat. Light up the stove and you could burn down the house. Luckily, if the doormat or stove failed to warn of coming disaster, a successful lawsuit might compensate you for your troubles. Or so the thinking has gone since the early 1980s, when juries began holding more companies liable for their customers’ misfortunes.
Feeling threatened, companies responded by writing ever-longer warning labels, trying to anticipate every possible accident. Today, stepladders carry labels several inches long that warn, among other things, that you might — surprise! — fall off. The label on a child’s batman cape cautions that toy "does not enable user to fly".
While warnings are often appropriate and necessary — the dangers of drug interactions, for instance — and many are required by state or federal regulations, it isn’t clear that they actually protect the manufacturers and sellers from liability if a customer is injured. About 50 percent of the companies lose when injured customers take them to court.
Now the tide appears to be turning. As personal injury claims continue as before, some courts are beginning to side with defendants, especially in cases where a warning label probably wouldn’t have changed anything. In May, Julie Nimmons, president of Schutt Sportswear in Illinois, successfully fought a lawsuit involving a football player who was paralyzed in a game while wearing a Schutt helmet. "We’re really sorry he has become paralyzed, but helmets aren’t designed to prevent those kinds of injuries," says Nimmons. The jury agreed that the nature of the game, not the helmet, was the reason for the athlete’s injury. At the same time, the American Law Institute — a group of judges, lawyers, and academics whose recommendations carry substantial weight — issued new guidelines stating that companies need not warn customers of various dangers or bombard (轰炸) them with a lengthy list of possible ones. "Important information can get buries in a sea of trivialities." says a law professor at Comell Law School who helped draft the new guidelines. "The information on products might actually be provided for the benefit of customers and not as protection against legal liability." [br] The case of Schutt helmet demonstrated that recently some injury claims ______ .
选项
答案
are no longer supported by law
解析
最后一段前两句提到,目前局势有所扭转。虽然人身伤害造成的赔偿案仍在增长,但一些法庭开始站在被告一边,尤其当商品的警示标签无论怎样写都于事无补的情况下。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3617112.html
相关试题推荐
It’saroughworldoutthere.Stepoutsideandyoucouldbreakalegslippin
It’saroughworldoutthere.Stepoutsideandyoucouldbreakalegslippin
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Isn’titrathercoldoutside,Sally?W:Itisabit,butIcan
[originaltext]M:Hithere.(19)Haveyouheardthatthecompanyiscuttingstaff?
随机试题
[A]acknowledged[B]conducted[C]consideration[D]convert[E]establishment[F]involve
Readcarefullythefollowingexcerptoncreditcard,andthenwriteyourres
AlbertEinsteinBornin1879,inUlm,Germany,Einstein
对
A. B. C. D.
口腔颌面部感染最常见的途径是A.外伤性 B.牙源性 C.血源性 D.医源性
下面关于公司债券的说法错误的是()。A.非公开发行公司债券必须进行信用评级
男性,45岁,1周前因急性阑尾炎,进行手术治疗时阑尾系膜出血,缝扎止血时致回肠末
A.《本草纲目》 B.《本草纲目拾遗》 C.《新修本草》 D.《证类本草》
简支梁受分布荷载作用如图4-13所示。支座A、B的约束力为()。
最新回复
(
0
)