首页
登录
职称英语
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scient
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scient
游客
2024-05-29
39
管理
问题
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scientific papers is skyrocketing. What is the main reason for it? That’s partly because labs are bigger, problems are more complicated, and more different subspecialties are needed. But it’s also because US government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have started to promote "team science". As physics developed in the post-World War Ⅱ era, federal funds built expensive national facilities, and these served as surfaces on which collaborations could crystallize naturally.
Yet multiple authorship--however good it may be in other ways presents for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is research misconduct, should tile liability be joint and several, accruing to all authors? If not, then how should it be allocated among them? If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review?
Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author’s particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road. Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names, agonize over whether a much cited paper was really the candidate’s work or a coauthor’s, and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility.
Problems of this kind change the argument, supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles. After all, if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions, then the judges better know what they did. But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole, whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field, a team is a team, and the members should share the credit or the blame. [br] There is a tendency that scientific papers are ______.
选项
A、getting more complicated
B、dealing with bigger problems
C、more of a product of team work
D、focusing more on natural than on social sciences
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。第一段说“这部分是因为实验室更大了,问题更加复杂,但是这也需要更多不同的附属专业,而且也是因为美国政府开始促进团队科学”。故答案为C)。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3610172.html
相关试题推荐
Forme,scientificknowledgeisdividedintomathematicalsciences,natural
Forme,scientificknowledgeisdividedintomathematicalsciences,natural
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Untilrecently,theacquisitionofscientificliteracyandtheenlargemento
Bookshavealwaysbeenthemaintoolsforteaching.Butavastnumberofnew
Bookshavealwaysbeenthemaintoolsforteaching.Butavastnumberofnew
Bookshavealwaysbeenthemaintoolsforteaching.Butavastnumberofnew
随机试题
A—favorablebalanceoftradeB—specialpreferenceC—
某投资者在5月份以30元/吨权利金卖出一张9月到期,执行价格为1200元/吨的小麦看涨期权,同时又以10元/吨权利金卖出一张9月到期执行价格为1000元/吨
虽然导致重大事故的可能性小,但经常发生事故,潜伏有伤亡事故发生的风险,该类风险被
进场工种、人数一览表的格式是固定的不能更改。
以下有关账户的阐述中,正确的是()A、总账是提供明细核算资料的指标,它是对明细
用于慢性肾衰竭高血钾防治的药物不包括A.碳酸氢钠B.螺内酯C.血液透析D.聚磺苯
教师要根据幼儿园的个体差异进行教育,下列现象中不属于幼儿个体差异的是( )A.
下列公文处理程序中属于发文办理的是( )。A.拟办 B.复核 C.传阅
某期货公司结算部工作人员王某利用工作便利,了解到所在公司一些客户的交易信息,王某
A.双侧翼外肌下头收缩,然后一侧翼外肌下头和冀内肌以及对侧咬肌和颞肌收缩 B.
最新回复
(
0
)