It is frequently assumed that the mechanization of work has a revolutionary

游客2024-05-04 44

问题 It is frequently assumed that the mechanization of work has a revolutionary effect on the lives of women. For example, it has been suggested that the employment of women in industry took them out of the household, their traditional sphere, and fundamentally altered their position in society. Jules Simon, a French politician, warned that by entering factories, women would give up their femininity.

Friedrich Engels, however, predicted that women would be liberated from the "social, legal, and economic subordination" of the family. Generally observers agreed mechanization would transform women’s lives.
Historians, particularly those investigating the history of women, now seriously question this assumption of transforming power. They conclude that such dramatic technological innovations as the spinning jenny, the sewing machine, the typewriter, and the vacuum cleaner have not resulted in equally dramatic social changes in women’s economic position or in the prevailing evaluation of women’s work. The employment of young women in textile mills during the Industrial Revolution was largely an extension of an older pattern of employment of young, single women as domestics. It was not the change in office technology, but rather the separation of secretarial work, previously seen as an apprenticeship for beginning managers, from administrative work that in the 1880’s created a new class of "dead-end" jobs, thenceforth(其后)considered "women’s work". The increase in the numbers of married women employed outside the home in the twentieth century had less to do with the mechanization of housework and an increase in leisure time for these women than it did with their own economic necessity and with high marriage rates that shrank the available pool of single women workers, previously, in many cases, the only women employers would hire.
Women’s work has changed considerably in the past 200 years, moving from the household to the office or the factory, and later becoming mostly white collar instead of blue collar work. Fundamentally, however, the conditions under which women work have changed little since before the Industrial Revolution: the segregation of occupations by gender, lower pay for women as a group, jobs that require relatively low levels of skill and offer women little opportunity for advancement all persist, while women’s household labor remains demanding. [br] According to the passage, what has not been fundamentally changed though women’s work moved from household to the office or the factory?

选项

答案 Women’s working conditions./ The nature of women’s work

解析根据关键词householdto the office，找到原文最后一段，文中说，过去200年间妇女的工作有了很大变化…但是从根本上看，妇女的工作环境和工业革命之前相比并没有多少变化，可知答案。

转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3583514.html

相关试题推荐

随机试题

最新回复(0)

It is frequently assumed that the mechanization of work has a revolutionary

Crowsareprobablythemostfrequentlymetandeasilyidentifiablememberso

Crowsareprobablythemostfrequentlymetandeasilyidentifiablememberso

Crowsareprobablythemostfrequentlymetandeasilyidentifiablememberso