首页
登录
职称英语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
游客
2024-04-03
52
管理
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed lawsuit(诉讼)in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test(They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes.)The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question. [br] The recent legal action taken by some black parents in California aimed to_____.
选项
A、draw public attention to IQ testing
B、put an end to special education
C、remove the state’s ban on intelligence tests
D、have their children enter white schools
答案
C
解析
根据文章第3段第2句“最近,一群黑人父母提出诉讼,声称该州禁止智商测验剥夺了他们的孩子接受这种测验的机会,是对孩子的歧视”,由此可判断黑人父母要求取消对智力测试的禁令。故此,应该选C。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3539014.html
相关试题推荐
ShouldMedicalSchoolsTurntoThree-yearPrograms?[A]ForTravisHill,
ShouldMedicalSchoolsTurntoThree-yearPrograms?[A]ForTravisHill,
ShouldMedicalSchoolsTurntoThree-yearPrograms?[A]ForTravisHill,
ShouldMedicalSchoolsTurntoThree-yearPrograms?[A]ForTravisHill,
ShouldMedicalSchoolsTurntoThree-yearPrograms?[A]ForTravisHill,
ShouldMedicalSchoolsTurntoThree-yearPrograms?[A]ForTravisHill,
Howwelookandhowweappeartoothersprobablyworriesusmorewhenweare
Howwelookandhowweappeartoothersprobablyworriesusmorewhenweare
Whilethemissionofpublicschoolshasexpandedbeyondeducationtoinclude
Whilethemissionofpublicschoolshasexpandedbeyondeducationtoinclude
随机试题
Nicepeopledoracismtoo.Liberalcommitmenttoamulti-ethnicBritainiswi
[A]Weapplyforcreditformanyreasons—maybeit’stobuyanewcar,house,comp
HowtoGetReadyforStudyingAbroadItwasailsomisle
对流行性出血热来说,下列哪项是错误的A.是自然疫源性疾病 B.野生鼠类是主要传
下列关于防烟分区的划分说法错误的是()。A.防烟分区可以跨越防火分区设置 B
关于穿越膨胀性岩土的铁路和公路隧道设计,下列哪些选项符合相关规范要求?( )A
①2×20年6月2日,甲公司自二级市场购入乙公司股票1000万股
不宜由会计法律制度进行规范的行为,可通过会计职业道德规范来实现,这体现出会计职业
关于监理工作中巡视的说法,正确的是( )。A.巡视检查记录是分部工程验收的主要依
钢制焊接储罐焊缝的质量检查项目包括()。A.通球试验 B.严密性试验 C.
最新回复
(
0
)