首页
登录
职称英语
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on
游客
2024-02-19
45
管理
问题
We question the utility and validity of the Worst Teacher Award conducted on 29 November by Undergrad, a Students’ Union magazine of our university. The main purpose behind the election was to give teachers an opportunity to review their teaching methods in light of the results.
Our concern is whether the election of one single teacher from each faculty by undergraduate students will substantially improve the quality of teaching. Surely this would be much better achieved by an extensive and standardized course-evaluation system.
According to the article on page 33 of the 3rd edition of Undergrad, the writer and his colleagues decided that it was time to "get their own back" on the teachers. There appears to be a strong aggressive tone on the whole. This seems contrary to the motive originally intended. We fear that an "unpopularity poll" is what really results.
This election was governed by the regulations of the Best Teacher Award, which required a minimum of 15 percent of voters for the results to be valid. However, as there was a very poor turnout, 17 of the "winners" were elected by less than 15 percent, which greatly reduced the representativeness of the outcome.
The teachers involved are not even given details of the masons for voting. We wonder how the organizing body can help these teachers improve their teaching methods when the evidence for their performance cannot be produced. The whole exercise is therefore worthless without these reasons made available.
A few popular newspapers have reported on the election, but the data shown are misleading. They do not show how many students voted for the teachers, merely rows of vague percentages. Most of the articles do not even state the results of the election, but only the names of elected teachers. We object to their irresponsible behaviour to both the voters and teachers alike. We believe the whole university wishes to strive for excellence in a constructive way.
Our conclusion is that the Worst Teacher Award has, from the beginning, lost sight of its virtuous purpose and has turned into something that destroys the image of our university teachers and, far worse, the mutual relationship between teachers and students. [br] It can be inferred from the passage that ______.
选项
A、the bad teachers will be highly motivated by the constructive results of the survey
B、the reports in most articles should avoid mentioning the names of those elected had teachers
C、the election will help improve the teacher-student relationship
D、the rules for electing the worst teachers were made without the approval of the university
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3463612.html
相关试题推荐
Forthisproblem,ourteacher’sideaisthat______(那个计划应该立即执行)theplan(should)be
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
Manyteachersbelievethattheresponsibilitiesforlearningliewiththest
随机试题
StandarddialectisA、adialectachildacquiresnaturallylikehisregionaldial
TheHealthBenefitsofDrinkingWater—Isbottleddrinkingwaterhealthi
Haiti’sTourismA)LikemanyofitsCaribbeanneighb
部门预算中基本支出预算的主要组成部分是( )。A.人员经费 B.日常公用经
特发性血小板减少性紫癜做骨穿的目的是A.证明有无巨核细胞增生 B.证明有无
(2016年真题)现值计算中,将未来某时点资金的价值折算为现在时点的价值称为(
下列关于五行生克规律的叙述,错误的是A.金为木之所胜 B.木为水之子 C.木
所谓“文化反哺”是指( )。A.逆向社会化 B.反社会化 C.再社会
下列金融机构中,由中国证券监督管理委员会负责监督管理的有()。A.保险公司
于不发火(防爆的)面层铺设的说法,正确的有()。A.面层采用的碎石其不发火
最新回复
(
0
)