首页
登录
职称英语
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income s
游客
2024-02-17
52
管理
问题
A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income students shows that a record number of the nation’s school districts will receive less in the coming academic year than they did for the one just ended.
For the 2005-2006 school year, spending under the Department of Education’s Title I program, which helps low-achieving children in high-poverty areas, is increasing by 3.2 percent, to $12.6 billion. But because of population shifts, growing numbers of poor children, newer census data and complex formulas that determine how the money is divided, more than two-thirds of the districts, or 8,843, will not receive as much financing as before.
The analysis, based on data from the department, was made by the Center on Education Policy, a group advocating for public schools. A similar study by the group last year showed that 55 percent of the schools would receive less money than they did in the previous year.
"It’s an alarming number," said Tom Fagan, a former department official who conducted the analysis. "It’s clear that the amount of overall increase is not keeping pace with the number of poor kids."
Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman, defended the spending levels for Title I, saying, "President Bush and Congress have invested record amounts of funding to help the nation’s neediest students."
But Mr. Fagan said the increasing number of districts that are losing money is making it harder for the schools to meet the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration’s signature education program, which measures progress through annual tests in math, reading and science. That is giving critics of the program more grounds to accuse the administration of not sufficiently financing the program while demanding greater results.
Title I provides the largest component of financing for No Child Left Behind.
"The federal government is concentrating more money in fewer districts," said John F. Jennings, the president and chief executive of the Center on Education Policy. "It means there is lots of anger and lots of tension. They’re asking us to do more and more with less and less." [br] Susan Aspey looks at the funding by the government with______.
选项
A、criticism
B、consent
C、indifference
D、expectation
答案
B
解析
观点态度题。本题考查文章人物的观点。苏珊·阿斯贝的观点态度只能从第5段推断出,从这一段中的defended和record amount of funding可知她对教育部的拨款数是认同的。选项A和C都是贬义词.不可能表达她的观点;选项D虽是褒义词,但苏珊是在陈述已发生的事实,而不是发表对教育部的期望。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3459497.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Nate:HeyPhil.HaveyoueverbeentoaJapanesepublicbath?Ih
______(没有一项发明获得如此多的表扬和批评)thanInternet.Noinventionhasreceivedmorepraiseand
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
InbothChinaandDenmarkchildrenare【S1】______andtheyreceiveagreatdea
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
[originaltext]M:Thenewmayorisreallyagoodpublicspeaker.Thespeechhed
随机试题
Modernliberalopinionissensitivetoproblemsofrestrictionoffreedoman
[originaltext]Tofinishtoday’sprogram,IwanttotellyouabouttheWater
对信息进行综合分析、概括提炼,获得高层次信息的过程是()。A.信息归纳 B.
以下哪些说法符合托马斯·阿奎那对“一般”的理解()A.一般不过是空气的震动
屋顶的坡度形成中,材料找坡是指()来形成。A.利用油毡的厚度 B.利用结构层
艾叶加工采用的方法是()。A.碾捣B.朱砂拌衣C.青黛拌衣D.揉搓E.制绒
我周《宪法》第31条规定:国家在必要时得设立特别行政区。在特别行政区内实行的制度
(2020年真题)治疗滴虫性阴道炎,应选用的药物是A.甲硝唑 B.克林霉素
下列属于咨询工程师,货物现场监造与检验工作的主要内容为()。A.可聘请有资
下列关于实行工程监理制,项目法人可以依据自身需求和有关规定委托监理,在工程监理单
最新回复
(
0
)