首页
登录
职称英语
Kodak’s decision to file for bankruptcy(破产)protection is a sad, though not u
Kodak’s decision to file for bankruptcy(破产)protection is a sad, though not u
游客
2024-02-11
44
管理
问题
Kodak’s decision to file for bankruptcy(破产)protection is a sad, though not unexpected, turning point for a leading American corporation that pioneered consumer photography and dominated the film market for decades, but ultimately failed to adapt to the digital revolution.
Although many attribute Kodak’s downfall to "complacency(自满)," that explanation doesn’t acknowledge the lengths to which the company went to reinvent itself. Decades ago, Kodak anticipated that digital photography would overtake film—and in fact, Kodak invented the first digital camera in 1975—but in a fateful decision, the company chose to shelf its new discovery to focus on its traditional film business.
It wasn’t that Kodak was blind to the future, said Rebecca Henderson, a professor at Harvard Business School, but rather that it failed to execute on a strategy to confront it. By the time the company realized its mistake, it was too late.
Kodak is an example of a firm that was very much aware that they had to adapt, and spent a lot of money trying to do so, but ultimately failed. Large companies have a difficult time switching to new markets because there is a temptation to put existing assets into the new businesses.
Although Kodak anticipated the inevitable rise of digital photography, its corporate(企业的)culture was too rooted in the successes of the past for it to make the clean break necessary to fully embrace the future. They were a company struck in time. Their history was so important to them. Now their history has become a liability.
Kodak’s downfall over the last several decades was dramatic. In 1976, the company commanded 90% of the market for photographic film and 85% of the market for cameras. But the 1980s brought new competition from Japanese film company Fuji Photo, which undermined Kodak by offering lower prices for film and photo supplies. Kodak’s decision not to pursue the role of official film for the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics was a major miscalculation. The bid went instead to Fuji, which exploited its sponsorship to win a permanent foothold in the marketplace. [br] Why do large companies have difficulty switching to new markets?
选项
A、They find it costly to give up their existing assets.
B、They tend to be slow in confronting new challenges.
C、They are unwilling to invest in new technology.
D、They are deeply stuck in their glorious past.
答案
D
解析
推理判断题。文章第四段最后提到,当大公司试图转入新的市场时,它们都会经历一段困难的时期,因为把现有的资产转移到新的行业是要经受住一定诱惑的。接着文章第五段用柯达的事例继续指出,它的企业文化如此沉溺于过去的辉煌,以至于它无法彻底脱离过去,也就无法完全投身于将来,所以答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3440978.html
相关试题推荐
______(他试图劝她打消离职的念头),butshesaidshewasresolvedtogobecauseshehadthough
Thoughitisbecomingincreasinglyeasytomovefromplacetoplace,ourina
Thoughitisbecomingincreasinglyeasytomovefromplacetoplace,ourina
Kodak’sdecisiontofileforbankruptcy(破产)protectionisasad,thoughnotu
[originaltext]M:What’sLauradoingheretoday?Ithoughtshewassupposedtob
[originaltext]M:What’sLauradoingheretoday?Ithoughtshewassupposedtob
[originaltext]M:What’sLauradoingheretoday?Ithoughtshewassupposedtob
[originaltext]M:What’sLauradoingheretoday?Ithoughtshewassupposedtob
[originaltext]M:What’sLauradoingheretoday?Ithoughtshewassupposedtob
[originaltext]M:What’sLauradoingheretoday?Ithoughtshewassupposedtob
随机试题
AResponsibilityRevolution"Wehavealwaysknownthatheedl
BritishpsychologistshavefoundevidenceofalinkbetweenexcessiveIntern
采用发热电缆地面辐射供暖方式时,发热电缆的线功率()。A.对不同场合有不同规
A.心源性休克 B.失水性休克 C.失血性休克 D.内失血浆性休克 E.
根据下图所提供的信息回答问题 农业生产资料(以下简称农资)主要包括化肥
把下面的六个图形分为两类,使每一类图形都有各自的共同特征或规律,分类正确的一项是
导致慢性胰腺炎的病因包括A.胆道系统疾病 B.自身免疫性疾病 C.慢性酒精中
甲公司与乙公司签订了1份木材购销合同,未约定交货地点,也未约定交货时间,且未
下列有关细节测试中运用非统计抽样评价样本结果的说法中,错误的有()。A.注册会
水闸放样中,细部的精度比主轴线()。A.低 B.持平 C.高 D.根
最新回复
(
0
)