首页
登录
职称英语
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?A)Some have called it a Ri
游客
2024-02-06
56
管理
问题
Who Lives? Who Dies? Who Decides?
A)Some have called it a Right to Die case. Others have labeled it a Right to Live case. One group of advocates has called for "death with dignity." Others have responded accusingly, "euthanasia".
B)At the center of the latest controversy about life and death, medicine and law, is a seventy-eight-year-old Massachusetts man whose existence hangs on a court order.
C)On one point, everyone agrees: Earle Spring is not the man he used to be. Once a strapping outdoorsman, he is now called senile by many, and mentally incompetent by the courts. He is, at worst, a member of living dead; at best, a shriveled version of his former self.
D)For more than two years, since his physical and then mental health began to deteriorate , Earle Spring has been kept alive by spending five hours on a kidney dialysis machine three times a week. Since January 1979, his family has pleaded to have him removed from the life-support system.
E)They believe deeply that he Earle Spring who was would not want to live as the Earle Spring who is. They believe they are advocates for the right to die in peace.
F)In the beginning, the court agrees. Possibly for the first time, they reeled last month in favor of withdrawing medical care from an elderly patient whose mind had deteriorated. The dialysis was stopped.
G)But then, in a sudden intervention, an outside nurse and doctor visited Earle Spring and testified that he was alert enough to "make a weak expression of his desire to live." And so the treatments were resumed.
H)Now, while the courts are waiting for new and more thorough evidence about Spring’ s mental state, the controversy rages about legal procedures; no judge ever visited Spring, no psychiatrist ever testified. And even more important, we are again forced to determine one person’ s right to die or to live.
I)This case makes the Karen Ann Quinlan story seem simple in comparison. Quinlan today hangs onto her "life" long after her "plug was pulled." But when the New Jersey court heard that case, Quinlan had no will. She had suffered brain death by any definition.
J)The Spring story is different. He is neither competent nor comatose. He lives in a gray area of consciousness. So the questions also range over the gray area of our consciences.
K)What should the relationship be between mental and physical treatment? Should we treat the incompetent as aggressively as the competent? Should we order heart surgery for one senile citizen? Should we take another off a kidney machine? Who is to decide?
L)Until recently, we didn’t have the technology to keep Earle Spring alive. Until recently, the-life-and-death decisions about the senile elderly or the retarded or the institutionalized were made privately between families and medical people. Now, increasingly, in States like Massachusetts, they are made publicly and legally.
M)Clearly there are no absolutes in this case. No right to die. No right to live. We have to take into account many social as well as medical factors. How much of the resources of a society or a family should be allotted to a member who no longer recognizes it? How many sacrifices should the healthy and vital make for the terminally or permanently ill and disabled?
N)In England, where kidney dialysis machines are scarce, Earle Spring would never have remained on one. In America, one Earle Spring can decimate the energy and income of an entire family.
O)But the Spring case is a crucial, scary one that could affect all those living under that dubious sentence "incompetent" or that shaky diagnosis "senile". So it seems to me that if there is any mental activity at all, then disconnecting him from life would be a dangerous precedent, far more dangerous than letting him continue.
P)The court ruled originally in favor of taking Spring off the machine. It ruled that this is what Earle Spring would have wanted. I have no doubt that his family believes it. I have no doubt of their affection or their pain.
Q)But I remember, too, what my grandfather used to say: No one wants to live to be one hundred until you ask the man who is ninety-nine. Well, no one, including Earle Spring, wants to live to be senile. But once senile, he may well want to live. We simply have to give him the benefit of the doubt. Any doubt. [br] Social and medical factors should be taken into consideration when life-and-death decisions are made.
选项
答案
M
解析
题干:当决定生死问题时,社会和医疗因素应该被考虑进去。题干关键词是social and medical,factors和life-and-death decisions。文中M段提到,很明显,这种事情没有绝对性的原则。没有权利死,也没有权利活,我们必须要考虑很多社会因素以及医疗因素。与题干意思一致,故选M。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3425808.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]WhenIwasgoinghometoIndialastyear,Icalledupmymoth
[originaltext]WhenIwasgoinghometoIndialastyear,Icalledupmymoth
RecentlytheBarbicanmuseuminLondonheldanexhibitioncalledtheRainRo
RecentlytheBarbicanmuseuminLondonheldanexhibitioncalledtheRainRo
RecentlytheBarbicanmuseuminLondonheldanexhibitioncalledtheRainRo
RecentlytheBarbicanmuseuminLondonheldanexhibitioncalledtheRainRo
[originaltext]M:Goodafternoon,ma’am.I’mMr.Smith.Icalledyoualittlewh
[originaltext]M:Goodafternoon,ma’am.I’mMr.Smith.Icalledyoualittlewh
[originaltext]M:Goodafternoon,ma’am.I’mMr.Smith.Icalledyoualittlewh
Oneafternoonrecently,two【B1】______friendscalledtotellmethat,well,t
随机试题
[originaltext]M:WhatshouldIdoaboutMrRomero?Remember?Hesaiditwasimp
同一通道中敷设的电缆,可选用不同一阻燃等级的电缆()。
(2016年真题)下列关于股份有限公司监事会的说法中,正确的有( )。 Ⅰ.
刘某,男,46岁,刻下眩晕而见头重如蒙,胸闷恶心,食少多寐,苔白腻,脉濡滑。
引起开放性气胸患者休克的主要原因是A:血容量不足 B:纵隔扑动,回心血量减少
材料: 小辉是班上有名的“调皮大王”,上课时,他在前排同学的后背上贴纸条,课问
假设某日人民币与美元间的即期汇率为1美元=6.270元人民币,人民币一个月的上海
对投资目标进行全方位控制,包括的含义有()。A:按工种分解的各项投资进行控制B
甲公司2017年年初开始进行新产品研究开发,2017年度投入研究费用3
在工程网络计划执行过程中,如果发现某项工作的完成时间拖后而导致工期延长时,需要调
最新回复
(
0
)