首页
登录
职称英语
Sugar shocked. That describes the reaction of many Americans this week follo
Sugar shocked. That describes the reaction of many Americans this week follo
游客
2024-01-21
61
管理
问题
Sugar shocked. That describes the reaction of many Americans this week following revelations that, 50 years ago, the sugar industry paid Harvard scientists for research that shifted the focus away from sugar’s role in heart disease—and put the spotlight (注意的中心) squarely on dietary fat.
What might surprise consumers is just how many present-day nutrition studies are still funded by the food industry. Nutrition scholar Marion Nestle of New York University spent a year informally tracking industry-funded studies on food. "Roughly 90% of nearly 170 studies favored the sponsor’s interest," Nestle tells us. Other systematic reviews support her conclusions.
For instance, studies funded by Welch Foods—the brand behind Welch’s 100% Grape Juice—found that drinking Concord grape juice daily may boost brain function.Another, funded by Quaker Oats, concluded, as a Daily Mail story put it, that "hot oatmeal (燕麦粥) breakfast keeps you full for longer. "
Last year, The New York Times revealed how Coca-Cola was funding well-known scientists and organizations promoting a message that, in the battle against weight gain, people should pay more attention to exercise and less to what they eat and drink. Coca-Cola also released data detailing its funding of several medical institutions and associations between 2010 and 2015.
"It’s certainly a problem that so much research in nutrition and health is funded by industry," says Bonnie Liebman, director of nutrition at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. "When the food industry pays for research, it often gets what it pays for. " And what it pays for is often a pro-industry finding.
Given this environment, consumers should be skeptical (怀疑的) when reading the latest finding in nutrition science and ignore the latest study that pops up on your news feed. "Rely on health experts who’ve reviewed all the evidence," Liebman says, pointing to the official government Dietary Guidelines, which are based on reviews of hundreds of studies.
"And that expert advice remains pretty simple," says Nestle. "We know what healthy diets are— lots of vegetables, not too much junk food, balanced calories. Everything else is really difficult to do experimentally. " [br] What does Liebman say about industry-funded research?
选项
A、It simply focuses on nutrition and health.
B、It causes confusion among consumers.
C、It rarely results in objective findings.
D、It runs counter to the public interest.
答案
C
解析
推理判断题。第五段第二、三句提到,利伯曼认为“食品工业为研究提供资金时,通常会得到相应的回报。”他们所支付的往往是一个利于推动该行业的发展的发现。由此可见,由食品工业资助的研究,其结果并不客观。故答案为C)。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3382610.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]APewResearchCentersurveyofmorethan1,000Americanscon
Americansspendbillionsofdollarseachyeartryingtochangetheirweightw
Americansspendbillionsofdollarseachyeartryingtochangetheirweightw
AccordingtothemajorityofAmericans,womenareeverybitascapableofbei
AccordingtothemajorityofAmericans,womenareeverybitascapableofbei
AccordingtothemajorityofAmericans,womenareeverybitascapableofbei
AccordingtothemajorityofAmericans,womenareeverybitascapableofbei
[originaltext]There’sonesoundthatgetsabigreactionfromkidsonahot
[originaltext]There’sonesoundthatgetsabigreactionfromkidsonahot
[originaltext]W:ThereisnewdataouttodaythatconfirmsthatmanyAmericans
随机试题
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions14-26whicharebasedonReading
Fromchildhoodtooldage,wealluselanguageasameansofbroadeningour
使用要素膳进行管饲营养空肠内连续输注,开始时的速度以多少为宜( )。A.100
女性,62岁,未孕。绝经6年,少量阴道流血2周。妇科检查:宫颈正常,子宫如妊娠6
休克性肺炎最常见的病原菌是A.革兰阴性杆菌 B.肺炎链球菌 C.呼吸道病毒
齿状线的临床意义?
患儿,4岁,食果冻误入气管,出现"三凹征"。判断该患儿呼吸困难的类型是A.吸气性
根据《刑事诉讼法》规定,下列关于证人的说法错误的是( )。A、证人一般为自然人,
建设银行C支行举办业务知识竞赛,所有的选手中没有出现名次并列的情况,小吴发现除了
(2013年真题)在合同履行期限届满之前,当事人一方明确表示或者以自己的行为表明
最新回复
(
0
)