2. 职称英语
  3. Many critics of Emily Bronte’s novel Wuthering Heights see its second part as a

Many critics of Emily Bronte’s novel Wuthering Heights see its second part as a

游客2024-01-11  53
问题 Many critics of Emily Bronte’s novel Wuthering Heights see its second part as a counterpoint that comments on, if it does not reverse, the first part, where a romantic reading receives more confirmation. Seeing the two parts as a whole is encouraged by the novel’s sophisticated structure, revealed in its complex use of narrators and time shifts. Granted that the presence of these elements need not argue for an authorial awareness of novelistic construction comparable to that of Henry James, their presence does encourage attempts to unify the novel’s heterogeneous parts. However, any interpretation that seeks to unify all of the novel’s diverse elements is bound to be somewhat unconvincing. This is not because such an interpretation necessarily stiffens into a thesis(although rigidity in any interpretation of this or of any novel is always a danger), but because Wuthering Heights has recalcitrant elements of undeniable power that, ultimately, resist inclusion in an all-encompassing interpretation. In this respect, Wuthering Heights shares a feature of Hamlet. [br] The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that an interpretation of a novel should
选项 A、not try to unite heterogeneous elements in the novel
B、not be inflexible in its treatment of the elements in the novel
C、not argue that the complex use of narrators or of time shifts indicates a sophisticated structure
D、concentrate on those recalcitrant elements of the novel that are outside the novel’s main structure
E、primarily consider those elements of novelistic construction of which the author of the novel was aware
答案 B
解析 This question requires the reader to determine what can be inferred from the passage about its author’s view of the interpretation of novels. Choice A may seem attractive because in the passage the author says that Wuthering Heights has heterogeneous elements that resist inclusion in a unifying interpretive scheme. Choice A is incorrect, however, because the author does not indicate that the unification of different elements is to be avoided in interpretation generally. By contrast, the author’s parenthetical statement about rigidity does present a general warning against inflexibility of interpretation, and it is this that supports Choice B as the correct answer. Choice C is incorrect, as the author actually suggests the contrary of this view in the second sentence of the passage. Although the author mentions recalcitrant elements of Wuthering Heights, there is no suggestion by the author that such elements deserve a special focus in interpretation. Therefore Choice D is incorrect. The author of the passage does not indicate which elements, if any, of novelistic construction are most worthy of consideration. Therefore Choice E is incorrect.
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3351969.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)