首页
登录
职称英语
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeav
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeav
游客
2023-12-26
58
管理
问题
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, taxpayers who wish to should be able to read about it without further expense. And science advances through cross-fertilization between projects. Barriers to that exchange slow it down.
There is a widespread feeling that the journal publishers who have mediated this exchange for the past century or more are becoming an impediment to it. One of the latest converts is the British government. Recently it announced that, the results of taxpayer-financed research would be available, free and online, for anyone to read and redistribute.
Britain’s government is not alone. Soon the European Union followed suit. In the U.S., the National Institutes of Health (NIH, the single biggest source of civilian research funds in the world) has required open-access publishing since 2008. And the Wellcome Trust, a British foundation that is the world’s second-biggest charitable source of scientific money, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also insists that those who receive its support should make their work available free.
Criticism of journal publishers usually boils down to two things. One is that their processes take months, when the Internet could enable them to take days. The other is that because each paper is like a mini-monopoly, which workers in the field have to read if they are to advance their own research, there is no incentive to keep the price down. The publishers thus have scientists — or, more accurately, their universities, which pay the subscriptions — in an armlock. That, combined with the fact that the raw material (manuscripts of papers) is free, leads to generous returns. In 2011, Elsevier, a large Dutch publisher, made a profit of £768 million on revenues of £2.06 billion — a margin of 37 percent. Indeed, Elsevier’s profits are thought so
egregious
by many people that 12,000 researchers have signed up to boycott the company’s journals.
Publishers do provide a service. They organize peer reviews, in which papers are criticized anonymously by experts (though those experts, like the authors of papers, are seldom paid for what they do). They also sort the scientific sheep from the goats, by deciding what gets published, and where. That gives the publishers huge power. Since researchers, administrators and grant-awarding bodies all take note of which work has got through this filtering mechanism, the competition to publish in the best journals is intense, and the system becomes self-reinforcing, increasing the value of those journals still further.
But not, perhaps, for much longer. Support has been swelling for open-access scientific publishing: doing it online, in a way that allows anyone to read papers free of charge. The movement started among scientists themselves, but governments are paying attention and asking whether they might also benefit from the change.
Much remains to be worked out. Some fear the loss of the traditional journals’ curation and verification of research. Even Sir Mark Walport, the director of the Wellcome Trust and a fierce advocate of open-access publication, worries that the newly liberated papers have ended up in different places rather than being consolidated in the way they want.
A revolution, then, has begun. Technology permits it; researchers and politicians want it. If scientific publishers are not trembling in their boots, they should be. [br] The author mentions the concerns of Sir Mark Walport, who______.
选项
A、strongly supports current publishing arrangements and models
B、worries about the poor quality of current scientific publication
C、believes that the weaknesses of open-access journals can easily be overcome
D、is afraid that good papers in open-access journals may be neglected
答案
D
解析
细节题。根据关键词定位原文第7段第2句,可知Sir Mark Walport强烈支持科研论文通过网络发表,但同时对这些论文的前景感到担忧,因为这种改革失去了传统审稿的保障。由此排除A和B,因为这两个选项是针对现行出版制度而言的,C选项在文中未提及,故选D(担心免费获取的期刊优秀论文可能被忽视)。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3306003.html
相关试题推荐
ShouldUrbanGrowthbeRestricted?VocabularyandExpressionsrepercussionA
ShouldUrbanGrowthbeRestricted?VocabularyandExpressionsrepercussionA
ShouldUrbanGrowthbeRestricted?VocabularyandExpressionsrepercussionA
ShouldUrbanGrowthbeRestricted?VocabularyandExpressionsrepercussionA
Onwhichdayisthehotelavailable?[br][originaltext]I’msorry.Thehotelfo
Onwhichdayisthehotelavailable?[br][originaltext]I’msorry.Thehotelfo
Whyshouldpeopleregulatetheresourceeffectively?[originaltext]Thedeclineo
Whatdoes"makeallowancesfor"meaninthesentence?[originaltext]Youshouldm
WhatshouldAmericantechcompaniesdotosecuretheirsuccess?[originaltext]Am
Accordingtothepassage,gender-neutralconstructionsshouldbeadvocatedbecau
随机试题
ItwasSaturdaymorninginMay,whenMrs.Greendrewbackhercurtainsandl
Whataddedtothedifficultyintheputtingoutofthebushfire?[originaltext]
[audioFiles]audio_eufm_j31_001(20082)[/audioFiles]A、Heisagoodfriendofthe
[originaltext]W:Hello,AirChina.WhatcanIdoforyou,Sir?M:CanIbooka
施工方案技术经济比较的主要指标有()。Ⅰ.单位面积造价;Ⅱ.降低成本率;Ⅲ.
A.1.0 B.0.10 C.0.010 D.
以下()属于柜台业务存在的主要操作风险点。A.柜员为实名客户开立账户 B.有
共用题干 患者女性,32岁。头昏、乏力、贫血,不能坚持工作。7年前开始感乏力、
20世纪初普朗克、波尔等物理学家共同创造了量子力学,它与相对论一起被认为是现代物
患者,男,70岁,外出登山途中突然出现胸前区疼痛,疼痛放射至左肩,休息2分钟后缓
最新回复
(
0
)