首页
登录
职称英语
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone
游客
2023-12-25
56
管理
问题
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone they’ve seen commit a crime, seven Euclid residents claim to have "witnessed" the encounter between Officer Michael Amiott and driver Richard Hubbard III by virtue of viewing a four-minute video on Facebook. Their unique argument has triggered discussion in the legal community about the role that "social media witnesses" could play in such cases.
"It used to just be the police officer’s word against the victim’s word," notes lead petitioner Richard T. Montgomery II. "Now, in the age of cellphone videos and social media, we as a community have the opportunity to participate in ensuring police accountability."
The racially and economically diverse group scored its first victory in late December when a municipal judge responded to its request by requiring the Cuyahoga County prosecutor to investigate Amiott for felonious assault during the August 2017 traffic stop.
The cellphone video, which has more than 11 million views on Facebook, shows the officer repeatedly punching Hubbard’s head as the 25-year-old man lay in the street. Separate video from a police cruiser’s dash cam shows Amiott wrestling Hubbard to the ground moments after he was ordered out of his car for a suspended driver’s license.
Amiott was fired two months later for excessive force. But in the majority-black city, emotions flared anew this October when he was rehired following an arbitrator’s ruling in his favor. The ensuing outcry included the NAACP announcing a travel advisory to people of color who might be driving through Euclid.
The legal issues raised by the citizens’ petition and the prospect of witnesses via social media are largely untested.
Cleveland attorney Rebecca Maurer, who wrote a popular blog about the "Serial" podcast’s recent focus on Cuyahoga County’s criminal justice system, expects such witnesses might have to first establish that they were somehow personally affected before being allowed to initiate charges.
"The judicial system relies on the idea of ’standing’ to regulate the type of cases that go to court," she said. "A judge who borrows from standing theory will want to know exactly why social media witnesses should initiate the case. Perhaps it’s enough if the petitioners are local residents claiming a personal stake in the security of their community."
In his ruling referring the matter to the county prosecutor, Euclid Municipal Judge Patrick Gallagher did point out that the petitioners fail to claim any "personal knowledge of Mr. Hubbard’s injuries." Had they done so, he could have taken more
drastic
action, the judge seemed to imply. Under Ohio law, Gallagher also could have used the citizens’ petition to circumvent the prosecutor’s office and issue an arrest warrant for Amiott.
Nearly a dozen other states also allow private citizens to initiate criminal charges — including Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Texas and Idaho.
In all but one, however, the decision to actually file criminal charges is left to a prosecutor or grand jury. The exception is South Carolina, where police also have that power.
Testimony from people claiming to have witnessed something via social media can be problematic, cautions Seth Stoughton, a University of South Carolina law professor and former officer, since video posted online, even unedited, often provides limited information about an event.
"Beyond what they see directly in front of them, officers also rely on peripheral, aural and tactile information ... That doesn’t always come across accurately, or at all, on video," said Stoughton, who writes extensively about police regulation and use of force. By definition, he added, social media witnesses will always have such limitations.
Some attorneys worry that the very community such individuals hope to protect could instead be negatively affected. Civil rights lawyer Maya Wiley, a former board chair of the NYC Civilian Complaint Review Board, an independent police oversight agency, warns of implicit bias in the criminal justice system that could favor a white social media witness over one of color. [br] The citizen’s petition caused lawyers’ concern over______.
选项
A、the role of cellphone videos on all kinds of platforms in such cases
B、the role of the people who witness something via social media in such cases
C、the role of the people who recorded those cellphone videos in such cases
D、the role of the legal community in such cases
答案
B
解析
细节题。通过题干关键词锁定第1段第2句,这次公民请愿书在法律界引发讨论,即“社交媒体证人”在此类案件中可能扮演什么角色,故正确答案为B。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3305457.html
相关试题推荐
Hewasfacingchargesonforgeryinacourtoflawbuthehiredagoodattorney
ProfessorSmithissomeoneweall______.A、lookuptoB、lookintoC、lookthroug
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
ProfessorSmithissomeoneweall______.A、lookuptoB、lookintoC、lookthrough
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
Hehasneverworriedabouthispropertiesbecausehehas______themagainstdisas
Individualsexposedtoloudnoiseforlongintervalsmaysuffertemporaryorper
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
随机试题
•Youwillhearabankexperttalkingaboutsomeofthecommonmistakesthatare
WeddingCustomsAroundtheWorldWeddingCeremoniesA
曲面与平面平行的切平面的方程是
神经阻滞时局麻药的注射部位是()A.注射到神经干(丛)旁 B.注射到神经末
某大型零售公司的内部审计师怀疑,公司旗下销售商品成本很高的3家商店都有存货舞弊行
开放式基金申购采用( )方式。若资金在规定时间内未( )到账,则申购不成功。
与上年同期相比,2012年中秋、国庆黄金周期间游客人均消费上升的有几个城市?(
2004-16.睡时汗出,醒时汗止,称为 A.盗汗B.绝汗C.自汗D.大
甲银行诉乙、丙、丁、戊借款担保合同纠纷案 乙系一个人独资企业(新新玩具厂)业主
下列关于网络犯罪管辖的选项正确的是:()A.网络犯罪案件由犯罪地公安机关立
最新回复
(
0
)