首页
登录
职称英语
Why do conservationists in Australia support the policy of killing cats? [br] [
Why do conservationists in Australia support the policy of killing cats? [br] [
游客
2023-12-24
61
管理
问题
Why do conservationists in Australia support the policy of killing cats? [br]
In July 2015, the Australian government announced a "war on feral cats" with the intention of killing over two million felines by 2020. The threat abatement plan to enforce this policy includes a mix of shooting, trapping and a reputedly "humane" poison.
Some conservationists in Australia are hailing this as an important step toward the rewilding of Australia’s outback, or the idea of restoring the continent’s biodiversity to its state prior to European contact. Momentum has also been building in the United States for similar action to protect many animals outdoor cats kill every year.
In opposition are animal advocates including the British singer Morrissey who are appalled at the rhetoric of a war on cats and promote nonlethal methods of controlling the negative effects of cats as being more effective and humane.
From a scientific perspective, there is little doubt that under particular geographic and ecological conditions, outdoor cats can threaten native species. This is especially true on oceanic islands whose wildlife evolved without cats and are consequently unadapted to feline predators. For example, when cats were introduced to Pacific islands by European colonists, their numbers grew until they frequently posed a threat to native wildlife.
Some conservationists claim that cats are the single largest threat to biodiversity regardless of ecological context. One oft-cited study in Nature Communications claims that 1.4 to 3.7 billion birds and 6.9 to 20.7 billion small mammals are killed by cats every year in the United States alone. Yet some have pointed out that the scientific case for this claim is shaky at best.
Why? Virtually every study of outdoor cats assumes that because cats in some habitats threaten biodiversity, they are a threat across all habitats everywhere. This is a projection from a small set of localized case studies to the world at large. In other words, a guesstimate.
选项
A、They prefer domestic pets to wild animals.
B、Outdoor cats tend to attack humans.
C、Feral cats are a threat to native species.
D、The positive effects of feral cats are overlooked.
答案
C
解析
因果关系的判断。本题与全文主旨相关,本文讲的是捕杀野猫政策及其原因。野猫作为外来物种,对澳大利亚和美国等地的本地物种造成了威胁,破坏了当地的生物多样性,因此政府决定出台相关政策加以遏制。相关信息可从关键句中得到,如“Momentum has also been building in the United States for similar action to protect the many animals outdoor cats kill every year”,“…outdoor cats can threaten native species”。因此本题答案为选项C。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3301291.html
相关试题推荐
Withoutactionthatsupportswomen’sliberation,thepromisesactasjustamira
TheAustralia-Chinarelationshipisnow,assomeofyouhaveheard,thirtyy
ArecentstudybytheCenterforEconomicPolicyResearchsaysthat,inorderto
ArecentstudybytheCenterforEconomicPolicyResearchsaysthat,inorderto
ArecentstudybytheCenterforEconomicPolicyResearchsaysthat,inorderto
ArecentstudybytheCenterforEconomicPolicyResearchsaysthat,inorderto
ArecentstudybytheCenterforEconomicPolicyResearchsaysthat,inorderto
ArecentstudybytheCenterforEconomicPolicyResearchsaysthat,inorderto
ArecentstudybytheCenterforEconomicPolicyResearchsaysthat,inorderto
ArecentstudybytheCenterforEconomicPolicyResearchsaysthat,inorderto
随机试题
Alongwitheachquestiontheteacherwritesthecorrectanswerandalsothreest
Selecttheappropriatesentencesfromtheanswerchoicesandmatchthemtot
Weshould______thegloriousrevolutionarytraditionandmakemuchmoreprogres
A.生物价 B.蛋白质功效比值 C.蛋白质净利用率 D.蛋白质消化率 E
下列属于单基因病的有:A.先天性聋哑 B.白化病 C.血友病 D.冠心病
患者女,32岁。因关节疼痛近2年,眼睑浮肿16个月,干咳1月,神志欠清20天于2
证券公司向客户提供投资建议,对证券价格的涨跌或者市场走势作出确定性的判断,应承担
颊系带为A.唇颊黏膜移行于牙槽黏膜的皱襞 B.口腔前庭沟上相当于上下尖牙或前磨
关于箱涵顶进季节性施工的说法正确的是( )。A.箱涵顶进应尽可能避开雨期 B
按国际惯例,承包商可索赔的总部管理费包括()A.现场管理费 B.保函手续
最新回复
(
0
)