首页
登录
职称英语
Napoleon was wrong when he dismissed the British as a nation of shopkeepers
Napoleon was wrong when he dismissed the British as a nation of shopkeepers
游客
2023-12-22
54
管理
问题
Napoleon was wrong when he dismissed the British as a nation of shopkeepers (and hence unfit to defeat France in war). Compared with France, Britain in the 1790s already had a bigger manufacturing base, a higher income per head and hence a tax base wide enough to pay for 22 years of conflict that led to the emperor’s Waterloo. Indeed, the demand for ships and munitions, created by the long war against France, boosted British industry.
Two centuries later, however, the little Corsican may have a point. This week ICI, the company that once symbolised British industry, became the target of a takeover bid from Akzo Nobel, a Dutch competitor. Meanwhile, Britain’s Tesco supermarket group is boldly expanding into America and other foreign markets in a bid to overtake France’s Carrefour (sorry, Monsieur l’Empereur) to become the world’s second-biggest retailer behind Wal-Mart. Britain has a much more open economy than America, measured by foreign trade or capital flows. Indeed, there could be no greater testimony to its health than the unsentimental ability to let one-time national champions float quietly off into another’s embrace.
Imperial Chemical Industries was born on the liner Aquitania in the mid-Atlantic when four British chemical barons of the 1920s agreed to combine forces. But the company started coming apart in the 1990s. It balked at buying Glaxo to become a world-class drugs company. Funking as predator, it became prey itself. Prodded by the threat of a hostile break-up bid from Lord Hanson, a corporate raider at the height of his powers, ICI floated off its drugs division, now AstraZeneca.
As it moved upmarket, ICI became progressively less imperial, less chemical and less industrial. It paid too much for Unilever’s specialty chemicals business and struggled to pay down the debt it incurred by selling its commodity petrochemicals operations at just the wrong point in the cycle. Its giant petrochemicals complex on Teesside—once the very symbol of British manufacturing strength—was sold to some Americans and now belongs to a Saudi company.
Such sell-offs go almost without comment now in Britain. When investors from Dubai snapped up P&O, another commercial relic of the British empire, Britons shrugged, even as nationalistic opposition in America forced the Arab buyers to find someone more trustworthy to take on the ports it owned there. German and French firms have snapped up British water and electricity companies, and London’s airports belong to a Spanish construction company. First the Dutch, then the Indians walked off with Britain’s steel industry. The Chinese bought Rover, the rump of Britain’s car industry, and shipped its machine tools back home.
It may only be a matter of time before BT (conveniently, no longer called British Telecom) becomes the first "national" telecoms incumbent in foreign hands; its mobile arm has already been taken by Spain’s Telefonica. Likewise BAE Systems (no longer British Aerospace) sees its future in America, perhaps in the belly of a beast named Boeing, Northrop Grumman or Lockheed Martin.
In most countries that would count as a litany of failure. But just as Britain led the world into industrialisation, so now Britain is leading it out. Today you can still find a few British engineers and scientists making jet engines and pharmaceuticals—and doing rather well at it. But many more are cooking up algorithms for hedge funds and investment banks—where in many cases they add more value. The economy has boomed these past 15 years, as manufacturing has been left behind and London has become the world’s leading international financial centre. Britain’s deficit in manufactured goods is hitting record highs. But so are the capital inflows.
All those foreign investors have brought a lot, too. Nissan’s car factory in Sunderland, for instance, is one of its finest anywhere. If foreigners think they can manage British factories or finances better than the natives can, they are welcome. [br] What does "go without comment" (Para. 5) mean?
选项
A、People don’t comment on it.
B、It becomes a matter of course.
C、Sell-offs carry on smoothly.
D、Britons are conventionally silent people.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3294243.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Americaisanationonwheels.MostAmericansarecarowners
[originaltext]Americaisanationonwheels.MostAmericansarecarowners
[originaltext]WhiletherestoftheworldplayedsoccerortheBritishfoot
[originaltext]WhiletherestoftheworldplayedsoccerortheBritishfoot
NextmonthalargegroupofBritishbusinesspeoplearegoingtoAmericaon
NextmonthalargegroupofBritishbusinesspeoplearegoingtoAmericaon
NapoleonfamouslydescribedtheBritishasanationofshopkeepers.Theseda
NapoleonfamouslydescribedtheBritishasanationofshopkeepers.Theseda
[originaltext]AccordingtotheUnitedNations,atouristissomeonewhotra
WhenSheltonJohnsonwas5,hisfamilytookhimtoBerchtesgadenNationalPa
随机试题
She’scute,noquestion.Symmetricalfeatures,flawlessskin,lookstobe22
Comparedwiththeprofitsofmusicsector,thoseofmoviesaremuchsmaller.[br
[originaltext]Forgoodorbad,computersarenowpartofourdailylives.W
《标准》要求首席审计执行官制定并维护一个质量保证活动来评估内部审计机构的工作。以
A.先天性甲状腺功能减低症 B.苯丙酮尿症 C.两者均有 D.两者均无智力
课程是课程表中所列出的学科科目。
下列关于传染病暴发流行的叙述,正确的是A.集中于某一人群 B.集中于某一职业
干化学试带法和pH检测同为酸碱指示剂法的是A.隐血B.尿胆素C.比密D.酮体E.
205、干式空芯电抗器出厂应进行匝间耐压试验,当设备()时,具备条件时应进行
证监会查明某公司报送、披露的申请首次公开发行股票并上市相关文件存在虚假记载、未按
最新回复
(
0
)