首页
登录
职称英语
For admissions officers, reviewing applications is like final-exam week for s
For admissions officers, reviewing applications is like final-exam week for s
游客
2023-12-18
39
管理
问题
For admissions officers, reviewing applications is like final-exam week for students except it lasts for months. Great applications tell us we’ve done our job well, by attracting top-caliber students. But it’s challenging to maintain the frenetic pace without forgetting these are all real people with real aspirations--people whose life stories we are here to unravel, if they will let us.
The essay is a key piece of learning those life stories. I live near Los Angeles, where every day screenplays are read without regard for human context. The writer’s life and dreams don’t matter--all that matters is the writing, the ideas, the end product. On the other hand, in reading essays, context does matter: who wrote this? We are driven to put the jigsaw puzzle together because we think we are building a community, not just choosing neat stories. When I pick up a file, I want to know whether the student has sib lings or not, who his parents are, where he went to high school. Then I want the essay to help the rest of the application make sense, to humanize all the numbers that flow past. I am looking for insight.
A brilliantly written essay may compel me to look beyond superficial shortcomings in an application. But if no recommendation or grade or test score hints at such writing talent, I may succumb to cynicism and assume the writer had help--maybe too much. In the worst cases, I may find that I have read it be fore--with name and place changed--on the Internet, in an essay-editing service or a "best essays" book.
The most appealing essays take the opportunity to show a voice not rendered homogeneous and pasteurized. But sometimes the essays tell us too much. Pomona offers this instruction with one essay option: "We realize that not everything done in life is about getting into college. Tell us about something you did that was just plain fun. "One student grimly reported that nothing was fun because in his family everything was about getting into college. Every activity, course choice and spare moment. It did spark our sympathy, but it almost led to a call to Child Protective Services as well.
Perfection isn’t required. We have seen phenomenal errors in essays that haven’t damaged a student at all. I recall a student who wrote of the July 1969 lunar landing of-I kid you not--Louis Armstrong. I read on, shaking my head. This student was great--a jazz trumpeter who longed to study astronomy. It was a classic slip and perhaps a hurried merging of two personal heroes. He was offered admission, graduated and went on for a PhD in astrophysics. He may not have been as memorable if he had named "Neil" instead of "Louis" in his essay’s opening line. Hey, we’re human, too.
An essay that is rough around the edges may still be compelling. Good ideas make an impression, even when expressed with bad punctuation and spelling errors. Energy and excitement can be communicated. I’m not suggesting the "I came, I saw, I conquered" approach to essay writing, nor the "I saved the world" angle taken by some students who write about community service projects. I’m talking about smaller moments that are well captured. Essays don’t require the life tragedy that so many seem to think is necessary. Not all admission offers come out of sympathy!
Admissions officers, even at the most selective institutions, really aren’t looking for perfection in 17 and 18-year-olds. We are looking for the human being behind the roster of activities and grades. We are looking for those who can let down their guard just a bit to allow others in We are looking for people whose egos won’t get in the way of learning, students whose investment in ideas and words tells us in the context of their records--that they are aware of a world beyond their own homes, schools, grades and scores. A picture, they say, is worth a thousand words. To us, an essay that reveals a student’s unaltered voice is worth much, much more. [br] An admissions officer may doubt whether an excellent essay is written by the applicant himself because ______.
选项
A、there might be some obvious weaknesses in his essay.
B、the officer might see signs of erasure on the essay paper.
C、there is no proof that the applicant has such writing ability.
D、the applicant may not bring his argument to a natural conclusion.
答案
C
解析
细节题。第三段第二句指出:But if no recommendation or grade or test score hints at such writing talent,I may succumb to cynicism and assume the writer had help—maybe too much。可见录取官员需要看到推荐信,学业成绩或考试成绩,证明该申请人有极好的写作能力,才会相信一篇好文章是该学生自己写的。故[C]为答案。[A]是对首句的曲解,不符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3283228.html
相关试题推荐
Foradmissionsofficers,reviewingapplicationsislikefinal-examweekfors
Foradmissionsofficers,reviewingapplicationsislikefinal-examweekfors
Foradmissionsofficers,reviewingapplicationsislikefinal-examweekfors
Inthecollegeadmissionswars.weparentsarethetruegladiators.We’repus
Inthecollegeadmissionswars.weparentsarethetruegladiators.We’repus
Inthecollegeadmissionswars.weparentsarethetruegladiators.We’repus
ForAmerica’scolleges,Januaryisamonthofreckoning.Mostapplicationsfor
ForAmerica’scolleges,Januaryisamonthofreckoning.Mostapplicationsfor
PoliceofficersinKolkatarefusedtoattendawomanwhowasshotbyrobberstry
Theofficershadbeenchargedwithenterprisecorruption,andprosecutorshadde
随机试题
Icameawayfrommyyearsofteachingonthecollegeanduniversitylevelwi
Computerhackershave【B1】______thesystemofthecompanythatrunstheNasd
建筑物的庭院回用雨水达到利用标准后,不能用于( )。A.消防 B.冲洗车辆
参与能力验证进行实验室之间比对的样品,一般应具备()特征。A.从材料源里指
某混凝土试块强度值不满足规范要求,但经法定检测单位对混凝土实体强度经过法定检测后
李老师和张老师教初二四个班的语文。50多岁的李老师任教近30年,工作兢兢业业,对
下列关于液力耦合调速描述,哪些项是正确的? A、液力耦合器是装于电动机和负载轴
一空调机组承担某建筑物特定区域的空气温、湿度调节,图15-3为其监控系统图。
正方形受压短柱如图(a)所示,若将短柱中间部分挖去一槽,如图(b)所示,则开槽后
容易见到角化珠的癌可以确定为( )。A.分化好的鳞癌 B.分化好的腺癌 C
最新回复
(
0
)