首页
登录
职称英语
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in
游客
2023-12-17
74
管理
问题
American economists once spoofed university education as the only industry in which those who consume its product do not purchase it; those who produce it do not sell it, and those who finance it do not control it. That apt description, made in the 1970s, has been undermined since then by the emergence of the first for-profit universities in the United States. Controlled by entrepreneurs, these schools which number about 700 and counting sell a practical education to career-minded students and make a good buck doing it. They are now expanding abroad, creating the first multinational corporations in a sector long suspicious of balance sheets.
The companies are lured by a booming market in which capitalist competition is still scarce. The num her of university students is expected to double in the next 25 years to 170 million worldwide. Demand greatly exceeds supply, because the 1990s saw massive global investment in primary and secondary schools, but not in universities. The number of children enrolled in primary or secondary schools rose by 18 percent around the world--more than twice the rate of increase in any previous decade. Now these kids are often graduating from high school to find no openings in national universities, which nevertheless don’t welcome for-profit competition. The Brazilian university teachers’ union warned that foreign corporations would turn higher education into "a diploma industry". Critics raised the specter of declining quality and a loss of Brazil’s "sovereign control" over education.
For-profit universities met with similar suspicion when they first opened in the United States. By the 1980s they were regularly accused of offering substandard education and had to fight for acceptance and respect. Lately, they have flourished by catering to older students who aren’t looking for keg parties, just a shortcut to a better career. For-profit colleges now attract 8 percent of four-year students in the United States, up from 3 percent a decade ago. By cutting out frills, including sports teams, student centers and summer vacation, these schools can operate with profit margins of 20 to 30 percent.
In some countries, the American companies operate as they do at home. Apollo found an easy fit in Brazil, where few universities have dorms, students often take off time between high school and college, and there’s no summer vacation--just two breaks in July and December. In other Latin countries, Sylvan has taken a different approach, buying traditional residential colleges like the Universidad del Valle de Mexico (UVM). It has boosted enrollment by adding and heavily advertising courses in career-track fields like business and engineering, and adding no-frills satellite campuses. Sensitive to the potential hostility against foreign buyers, Sylvan keeps original school names, adding its own brand, Sylvan International Universities, to publicity materials, and keeps tuition in line with local private schools.
Most of the schools that Sylvan has purchased were managed by for-profits to begin with, including the prestigious Les Roches Hotel Management School in Switzerland. But in general, Says Urdan, Sylvan’s targets "have not been run with world-class business practices. They’re not distressed, but there’s an opportunity for them to be better managed." When Sylvan paid $ 50 million for a controlling stake in UVM two years ago, the school had revenues of about $ 80 million and an enrollment of 32,000. The success of the for-profits is nothing to be afraid of, says World Bank education expert Jamil Salmi: "I don’t think they will replace traditional universities, but they can push some more traditional providers to be more innovative and more attentive to the needs of the labor market."
Some students at Sylvan schools in Latin America welcome the foreign invasion. At the Universidad de las Americas in Santiago, Daniela Villagran says friends tease her for studying at "Yankeeland," but she figures Sylvan connections "will give me an edge when I go out to look for a job. "The emphasis on in dependent thought is what separates UVM from other institutions in Mexico. And, for better or worse, more American schools are on the way. [br] Recently, for-profits universities have been favored by older people because ______.
选项
A、the teaching methods are appropriate to them.
B、they provide short-term training programs.
C、they can secure them a brighter future.
D、they can enable them to get higher salaries.
答案
C
解析
细节题。由题干中的older students定位至第三段。第三句指出:Lately,they have flourished by catering to older students who aren’t looking for keg parties,just a shortcut to a better career.[C]符合文意,故为答案。[A]和[B]与内容无关,排除。这里说的是a better career.并不一定意味着higher salaries,[D]不符合文意,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3282215.html
相关试题推荐
AskanAmericanschoolchildwhatheorsheislearninginschoolthesedaysa
AskanAmericanschoolchildwhatheorsheislearninginschoolthesedaysa
WhichdoesNOTbelongtothejudicialsystemsprovidedbytheAmericanFederalG
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,m
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,m
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,m
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,m
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,m
Divorceandout-of-wedlockchildbirtharetransformingthelivesofAmerican
[originaltext]INTERVIEWER:WhatdoEasternandWesternfamilyeducationsharei
随机试题
挂接在总线上的多个部件()A.只能分时向总线发送数据,并只能分时从总线接收数据
阿司匹林的片剂在空气中放置一段时间后,颜色会变黄→红棕色,原因是A.聚合 B.
重型胎盘早剥与先兆子宫破裂共有的临床表现是A:合并妊娠期高血压疾病 B:剧烈腹
下列不属于遥感不足的表现的是()。A.图像判读、解译后获得的往往是对地物的
下列对于写字楼租赁合约中的条款规定说法正确的有()。A:折让优惠是业主给租户提供
被认为是加强党的建设特别是领导班子、领导干部思想政治建设的一次创造性探索和成功实
根据《建筑安装工程费用项目组成》(建标[2013]44号)的规定,计算安全文明施
(2019年真题)多孔标准跨径总长为500m的桥梁属于()。A.特大桥 B.大
(2013年真题)根据《计量法》,关于计量器具使用的说法,正确的是()。A.计
下列不属于专属管辖的是()。A.房屋买卖纠纷 B.知识产权中的财产纠纷 C.
最新回复
(
0
)