2. 职称英语
  3. A funny thing happened on the way to the communications revolution: we stopped

A funny thing happened on the way to the communications revolution: we stopped

游客2023-12-12  71
问题   A funny thing happened on the way to the communications revolution: we stopped talking to one another.
  I was walking in the park with a friend recently, and his cell phone rang, interrupting our conversation. There we were, walking and talking on a beautiful sunny day and -- poof! -- I became invisible, absent from the conversation.
  The park was filled with people talking on their cell phones. They were passing other people without looking at them, saying hello, noticing their babies or stopping to pet their puppies. Evidently, the untethered electronic voice is preferable to human contact.
  The telephone used to connect you to the absent. Now it makes people sitting next to you feel absent. Recently I was in a car with three friends. The driver shushed the rest of us because he could not hear the person on the other end of his cell phone. There we were, four friends zooming down the highway, unable to talk to one another because of a gadget designed to make communication easier.
  Why is it that the more connected we get, the more disconnected I feel? Every advance in communications technology is a setback to the intimacy of human interaction. With e-mail and instant messaging over the Internet, we can now communicate without seeing or talking to one another. With voice mail, you can conduct entire conversations without ever reaching anyone. If my mom has a question, I just leave the answer on her machine.
  As almost every conceivable contact between human beings gets automated, the alienation index goes up. You can’t even call a person to get the phone number of another person anymore. Directory assistance is almost always fully automated.
  Pumping gas at the station? Why say good-morning to the attendant when you can swipe your credit card at the pump and save yourself the both.
  Making a deposit at the bank? Why talk to a clerk who might live in the neighborhood when you can just insert your card into the ATM?
  Pretty soon you won’t have the burden of making eye contact at the grocery store. Some supermarket chains are using a self-scanner so you can check yourself out, avoiding those annoying clerks who look at you and ask how you are doing.
  I am no Luddite. I own a cell phone, an ATM card, a voice-mall system, an e-mail account. Giving them up isn’t an option -- they’re great for what they’re intended to do. It’s their unintended consequences that make me cringe.
  More and more, I find myself hiding behind e-mall to do a job meant for conversation. Or being relieved that voice mail picked up because I didn’t really have time to talk. The industry devoted to helping me keep in touch is making me lonelier -- or at least facilitating my antisocial instincts.
  So I’ve put myself on technology restriction: no instant messaging with people who live near me, no cell-phoning in the presence of friends, no letting the voice mall pick up when I’m home.
  What good is all this gee-whiz technology if there’s no one in the room to hear you exclaim, "Gee whiz?"  [br] What can NOT communications technology do according to the passage?
选项 A、To help people communicate without seeing each other.
B、To help conduct the conversation without talking with each other directly.
C、To help people get other’s phone numbers.
D、To help shorten the distance between people.
答案 D
解析 细节题。询问信息技术不能做什么，采用排除法即可。第五段中作者举例说，有了电子邮件，我们现在交流时彼此不看对方或彼此不交谈，故排除A；有了语音邮件，你就可以在不直接打电话给任何人的情况下进行整个谈话过程，故排除B；第六段中提到你甚至不用再给一个人打电话询问另一个人的电话号码，因为姓名地址查找系统几乎完全是自动的，排除 C。然而在第五段的开头作者就发出了感慨：联系更加密切，却感到隔膜加深了。可见，信息技术并不能真正缩短人们间的距离，故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3266255.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)