首页
登录
职称英语
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ri
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ri
游客
2023-12-11
71
管理
问题
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, credits the world’s economics and social progress over the last thousand years to "Western civilization and its dissemination." The reason, he believes, is that Europeans invented systematic economic development. Landes adds that two unique aspects of Europeans culture were crucial ingredient in Europe’s economic growth.
First, Landes espouses a generalized form of Max Weber’s thesis that the values of work, initiative, and investment made the difference for Europe. Despite his emphasis on Science, Landes does not stress the notion of rationality as such. In his view, "what counts is work, thrift, honesty, patience, tenacity." The only route to economic success for individuals or states is working hard, spending less than you earn, and investing the rest in productive capacity. This is the fundamental explanation of the problem posed by his book’s subtitle: "Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor." For historical reasons an emphasis on private property, an experience of political pluralism, a temperate climate, an urban style-sEuropeans have, on balance, followed those practices and therefore have prospered.
Second, and perhaps most important, Europeans were learners. They "learned rather greedily," as Joel Mokyr put it in a review of Landes’s book. Even if Europeans possessed indigenous technologies that gave them an advantage (spectacles, for example), as Landes believes they did, their mom vital asset was the ability to assimilate knowledge from around the World and put it to use--as in borrowing the concept of zero and rediscovering Aristotle’s Logic from the Arabs and taking paper and gunpowder from the Chinese via the Muslim world. Landes argues that a systematic resistance to learning from other cultures had become the greatest handicap of the Chinese by the eighteenth century and remains the greatest handicap of Arab countries today.
Although his analysis of Europeans expansion is almost nonexistent, Landes does not argue that Europeans were beneficent bearers of civilization to a benighted world. Rather, he relies on his own commonsense law: "When one group is strong enough to push another around and stands to gain by it, it will do so." In contrast to the new school of world historians, Landes believes that specific cultural values enabled technological advances that in turn made some Europeans strong enough to dominate people in other parts of the world. Europeans therefore proceeded to do so with great viciousness and cruelty. By focusing on their victimization in this process, Landes holds, some postcolonial states have wasted energy that could have been put into productive work and investment. If one could sum up Landes’s advice to these states in one sentence, it might be "Stop whining and get to work." This is particularly important, indeed hopeful, advice, he would argue, because success is not permanent. Advantages are not fixed, gains from trade are unequal, and different societies react differently to market signals. Therefore, not only is there hope for undeveloped countries, but developed countries have little cause to be complacent, because the current situation "will press hard" oil them.
The thrust of studies like Landes’s is to identify those distinctive features of European civilization that lie behind Europe’s rise to power and the creation of modernity more generally. Other historians have placed a greater emphasis on such features as liberty; individualism, and Christianity. In a review essay, the art historian Craig Clunas listed some of the less well known linkages that have been proposed between Western culture and modernity, including the propensities to think quantitatively, enjoy pornography, and consume sugar. All such proposals assume the fundamental aptness of the question: What elements of Europeans civilization led to European success? It is a short leap from this assumption to outright triumphalism. The paradigmatic book of this school is, of course, The End of History and the Last Man, in which Francis Fukuyama argues that after the collapse of Nazism in the twentieth century, the only remaining-model for human organization in the industrial and communications ages is a combination of market economics and limited, pluralist, democratic government. [br] In discussing Landes’s work, the author’s tone is ______.
选项
A、enthusiastic,
B、skeptical.
C、reproachful.
D、matter-of-fact.
答案
D
解析
态度题。在对Landes的作品进行介绍时,作者使用了诸如he believes,Landes adds,Landes believes, Landes argues,Landes holds等客观引述的结构,全文论述没有夹带作者自己的观点,末就Landes的观点和作品进行任何评论,因此为客观引述,故[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3264978.html
相关试题推荐
TheprincipalauthoroftheDeclarationofIndependencewasA、BenjaminFranklin.
______isthefirstAmericanauthortowintheNobelPrize.A、FitzgeraldB、Sincla
TheUnitedNationsGeneralAssemblywillsetupanewagencyto[originaltext]
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisTRUE?[originaltext]Russianauthorities
WhichofthefollowingisCORRECT?[originaltext]Healthauthoritiesinmany
DouglasAdams,thelatelamentedauthorofTheHitchhiker’sGuidetotheGal
DouglasAdams,thelatelamentedauthorofTheHitchhiker’sGuidetotheGal
DouglasAdams,thelatelamentedauthorofTheHitchhiker’sGuidetotheGal
DouglasAdams,thelatelamentedauthorofTheHitchhiker’sGuidetotheGal
WhatdoseveralairlinesblametheEuropeanauthoritiesfor?[br][originaltext
随机试题
Theattemptandoffertocarryoutcloningexperimentonhumanbeingisblamewor
Completethetablebelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSAND/ORANUMBERforeac
_________________________(你一给某人发送私人信息)thanitappearedonthatperson’sscreen
下列再生能力最强的细胞是:A.骨细胞 B.骨骼肌细胞 C.软骨细胞 D.神
学校德育中的核心部分是()A.政治的教育 B.思想的教育 C.德行的教育
血证的发生,可因为下列何种因素A.肺胃热盛,迫血妄行 B.气血亏虚,气不摄血
阐述重测信度、复本信度、分半信度、同质性信度的含义及其误差来源。
血小板与非血小板表面粘着的现象称为血小板 A.黏附B.聚集C.凝集D.激
“美人鱼”的学名叫什么?() A.鲤艮B.儒艮C.鳟鱼D.鲮鱼
某保险公司拥有一个指数型基金,规模为50亿元,跟踪的标的指数为沪深300指数,其
最新回复
(
0
)