首页
登录
职称英语
(1)Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of
(1)Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of
游客
2023-12-03
44
管理
问题
(1)Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in "social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question: "Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
(2)The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved: in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted", in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the US—meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity: levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Or for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying "yes"—and the Turks with 6.5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French(or Turkish)every year.
(3)Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media.
(4)This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether "generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools, we have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
(5)So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man. Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
(6)But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that "generally speaking, people cannot be trusted" are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. For example, every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on. Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
(7)But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. US evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear mat trust is linked to "social capital" —networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common places.
(8)Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can; but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. Firstly, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better. [br] The British have lowered trustfulness NOT because of______.
选项
A、strained relations in the family
B、the increasing social crimes
C、infamous deeds of celebrities
D、the society in a state of disorder
答案
B
解析
第2段第2句提到,从统计数字和耸人听闻的新闻提要可知,社会混乱、宗教衰落、公众丑闻、家庭破裂以及对犯罪的恐惧使我们较少信任他人,B中的increasing未在文中体现,故选B。A、C、D分别是对原文该句的family fragmentation,public scandals和social dislocation的同义改写,故可一并排除。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3240084.html
相关试题推荐
Whomcanyoutrustthesedays?ItisaquestionposedbyDavidHalpernofCa
"Howdoesthehumanbrainwork?"remainsoneofthemostprofoundquestionsconf
Whomcanyoutrustthesedays?ItisaquestionposedbyDavidHalpernofC
Whomcanyoutrustthesedays?ItisaquestionposedbyDavidHalpernofC
Whomcanyoutrustthesedays?ItisaquestionposedbyDavidHalpernofC
Whomcanyoutrustthesedays?ItisaquestionposedbyDavidHalpernofC
Whomcanyoutrustthesedays?ItisaquestionposedbyDavidHalpernofC
Whomcanyoutrustthesedays?ItisaquestionposedbyDavidHalpernofC
Whomcanyoutrustthesedays?ItisaquestionposedbyDavidHalpernofC
[originaltext]M:WhentheonemanisSteveJobs,it’saquestionwellworthask
随机试题
【S1】[br]【S2】Fsee…as,把……看作/视作,本句的意思是“……总是悲观的把丛林看作敌人”,故选F。
Jupiter______perhapsthemostimportantplanetofthesolarsystem.A、wasB、wer
内分泌系统的反馈调节中,作为靶腺的有()。A.甲状腺 B.胰腺 C.性腺
寒冷地区公共建筑的供暖热源应优先采用下列哪种形式( )。A.市政热网 B.自
限制低温热水地面辐射供暖系统的热水供水温度,主要是出于()的考虑。A.有利于
从活动类型看,2011年研究经费比上年增加额最多的和增长率最高的活动类型
茵陈利胆成分不包括A.绿原酸B.茵陈槲皮素C.咖啡酸D.茵陈炔酮E.6,7-二甲
糖尿病的基本病理生理改变是A.葡萄糖耐量降低 B.胰岛素绝对或相对分泌不足
下列应当征收消费税的是()。A.影视演员用的上妆油 B.体育上用的发令纸
B公司为增值税一般纳税人,12月1日从A公司购入甲材料1000
最新回复
(
0
)