首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a
游客
2023-11-23
57
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals. [br] What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本题询问全文的主要内容。全文讲述了铁道案件及过去和现在人们对此类案件的态度和立场。因此只有D项较为全面准确地概括了全文的内容。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3211236.html
相关试题推荐
Beyonddemographics,theUnitedStatesconfrontswitharangeofother【M1】_
Beyonddemographics,theUnitedStatesconfrontswitharangeofother【M1】_
Beyonddemographics,theUnitedStatesconfrontswitharangeofother【M1】_
Beyonddemographics,theUnitedStatesconfrontswitharangeofother【M1】_
Inthe19thCenturyandearly20thCentury,railwaytrainshadavitalrole
Inthe19thCenturyandearly20thCentury,railwaytrainshadavitalrole
Inthe19thCenturyandearly20thCentury,railwaytrainshadavitalrole
Inthe19thCenturyandearly20thCentury,railwaytrainshadavitalrole
Inthe19thCenturyandearly20thCentury,railwaytrainshadavitalrole
Inthe19thCenturyandearly20thCentury,railwaytrainshadavitalrole
随机试题
Couldaplantvirushavefoundawaytoinfecthumans?Ithasalwaysbeenas
Becauseearlymanviewedillnessasdivinepunishmentandhealingaspurifica
女性,24岁,孕34周,既往体健,下肢水肿,头痛,咳嗽气短1周,血压22/16k
《“十三五”旅游业发展规划》指出,为实现“十三五”时期旅游业发展目标,必须牢固树
举例说明运用分析法证明数学结论的思维过程和特点。
病人目胞色黑而晦暗者,属A.湿热内蕴B.血虚失血C.肝胆失疏D.血虚E.肾虚
动脉导管未闭<P>A.肺动脉高压时可出现下半身青紫<br>B.肺动脉瓣第2心音固
根据相关法律法规,目前主要有中央投资项目和工程建设项目两类招标代理机构资格。下列
李某花2000元购得某省M公司生产的苦茶一批,发现其备案标准并非苦茶的标准,且保
利润表中“综合收益总额”项目依据企业净利润和其他综合收益(税后净额)的合计金额填
最新回复
(
0
)