首页
登录
职称英语
It is refreshing to see an international organization not only subjecting i
It is refreshing to see an international organization not only subjecting i
游客
2023-11-22
43
管理
问题
It is refreshing to see an international organization not only subjecting itself to criticism but also publishing the results. A report published today by the International Development Association which lends on highly concessionary terms to the poorest countries, deserves credit on both counts. But the reasons for producing this sizeable document say as much about the crisis facing aid agencies as they do about the recipients of aid.
In the nature of things the document is self-justificatory. It would be curious indeed for a group of international civil servants enjoying substantial tax-free salaries to recommend their own disbandment.The report concludes that without IDA, the situation in the world’s poorest countries "would have been even worse, and the needs today even greater".
Leaving aside whether one can say what would have happened otherwise, there is no doubt that in the 22 years since its inception IDA has been diligent. It has committed $27,000m to 1,302 projects in 78 countries. This year disbursements will be about $2,100m, despite the argument over IDA’s funding which has left it with less money than expected.
All of these considerable sums have gone to the poorest countries on generous terms. No country with a per capita income of more than $730 is eligible for IDA assistance, and in 1980 no less than 80 percent of net disbursements were to countries with per capita incomes of only $410. When incomes are so desperately low, it is not surprising that the terms allow repayment over 50 years without interest.
Nevertheless, as IDA candidly admits, measuring the effectiveness of such aid is difficult. It insists that projects must pay for themselves. In effect, the rate of return must provide the borrowing government with revenue to meet its obligations or else the loan becomes a subsidy. [br] What qualifies a country for financial aid from IDA?
选项
A、A per capita income of more than $730.
B、A per capita income of less than $410.
C、A per capita income of more than ∮2,100.
D、A per capita income of less than $730.
答案
D
解析
本题询问什么样的国家有资格获得IDA的经济援助。相关语句为“No country with a per capita in come or more than $730 is eligible for IDA assistance”,就是说A country with a per capita income of less than $730 is eligible for IDA assistance。 只有D是符合此意的。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3208690.html
相关试题推荐
(1)TheParis-basedInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA),initsannualforecast,
(1)TheParis-basedInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA),initsannualforecast,
(1)TheParis-basedInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA),initsannualforecast,
(1)TheParis-basedInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA),initsannualforecast,
Somepeoplebelievethatinternationalsportcreatesgoodwillbetweenthenat
Somepeoplebelievethatinternationalsportcreatesgoodwillbetweenthenat
[originaltext]OlympicGames,internationalsportscompetition,heldevery
WhatdidtheInternationalCentersendouttostudents?[br][originaltext]W:A
WhatdidtheInternationalCentersendouttostudents?[originaltext]W:Areyou
AccordingtotheU.N.FoodandAgriculturalOrganization,howmuchwillZimbabw
随机试题
Whichnumbercomesnextinthisseriesofnumbers?23571113?17前面几个数都是质数,所
[originaltext]W:Youdon’tlooksmartthismorning.Icanseeyou’renothappy.
Islanguage,likefood,abasichumanneedwithoutwhichachildatacritica
Asmytrainwasnotduetoleaveforanotherhour,Ihadplentyoftimetos
关于项目盈亏平衡分析的正确说法是()。A.只有线性盈亏分析 B.只有非线性
腹部实质性脏器手术的切口属于A.轻度污染伤口 B.可能污染伤口 C.污染伤口
患者,男,40岁。胸前区疼痛,胸闷,心电图提示心肌缺血。患者可能产生牵涉痛的部位
工程质量保修书应由()签署。A、施工单位 B、建设单位 C、分包单位
腹部切口疝多见于 A.腹部横切口B.腹部斜切口C.腹部纵行切口D.麦氏切
下列关于水利工程合理使用年限及耐久性的说法中,正确的有()。A.某Ⅲ等水库
最新回复
(
0
)