首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
游客
2023-11-09
59
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals. [br] What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3171318.html
相关试题推荐
Inadditiontotheirmilitaryrole,thefoalsofthenineteenthcenturypro
Inadditiontotheirmilitaryrole,thefoalsofthenineteenthcenturypro
Inadditiontotheirmilitaryrole,thefoalsofthenineteenthcenturypro
A(n)______lackoffoodbroughthungertotheIraqipeople.A、crucialB、critical
Bytheendofthiscenturyanintelligentrobot______todomostofthehousewor
Afghanistan’sfirstmatchwillbeagainst______.[br][originaltext]Afghan
WhathappenedattheUnitedNations?Howdidthecriticslikethenewpl
WhathappenedattheUnitedNations?Howdidthecriticslikethenewpl
WhathappenedattheUnitedNations?Howdidthecriticslikethenewpl
WhathappenedattheUnitedNations?Howdidthecriticslikethenewpl
随机试题
Mostpeoplewhogoonlinehavemainlypositiveexperience.But,【C1】______a
Managersneedtofindwaystogivetheiremployeesalifttoimprovetheirm
Scholarsandstudentshavealwaysbeengreattravelers.Theofficialcasef
患者,女性,42岁,风心病二尖瓣狭窄伴房颤10年,半身麻木、活动不便3d,来院就
控制性详细规划中,指标确定一般采用的方法有()。A.测算法 B.研究法
久病卧床引起的周身疼痛是由于A.邪滞经络,经气不舒 B.营气不足,气血不和
乙购买了一块昂贵的劳力士表后,到处炫耀。甲对此十分嫉妒,于是骗乙说要请他吃饭,在
根据《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》,当承包人投标报价中材料单价低于基准单价时,施
根据授权制定的法规与法律规定不一致,不能确定如何适用时,由()裁决。A.全国人大
(2021年真题第2批)某施工项目部对工人进行安全用电操作教育,同时对现场的配电
最新回复
(
0
)