首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
游客
2023-11-09
39
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals. [br] Which of the following is NOT true in Farwell’s case?
选项
A、Farwell was injured because he negligently ran his engine off the track.
B、Farwell would not have been injured if the switchman had been more careful.
C、The court argued that the victim had accepted the risk since he had willingly taken his job.
D、The court decided that the railroad should not be held responsible.
答案
A
解析
文章第3段第2句在介绍Farwell受伤时的情况时说,由于扳道工人的疏忽,他的引擎偏离了轨道.才使得Farwell失去了右手,这并不是由于Farwell本人的疏忽造成的,因此应选A。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3171315.html
相关试题推荐
TheU.S.condemned[originaltext][29C]TheUnitedSlateshascondemnedIsrae
ThroughouttheUnitedStates,insurancelawsfollowageneralpatternalthough__
Whatisthetopicofthenews?[br][originaltext]TheUnitedNationsestima
Nepal’sgovernmentdeployedairpatrolsandpoliceofficerstoguardagainst[br
Nepal’sgovernmentdeployedairpatrolsandpoliceofficerstoguardagainst[or
PeopleinYemenwentouttoprotestagainst[br][originaltext](21)Thousan
WhathadChineseAmericansbeenassociatedformanyyearsintheUnitedStates?
WhathadChineseAmericansbeenassociatedformanyyearsintheUnitedStates?
______intheUnitedStates,St.Louishasnowbecomethe24thlargestcity.A、Th
IntheUnitedStatesthefirstdaynurserywasopenedin1854.Nurserieswe
随机试题
Henrywouldratherhisgirlfriend______inthesameplantashedoes.A、worksB、
ThetransportationofconvictstoAustraliawasphasedoutbetween1840an
说明:根据下列信息,填一份个人资料表。张明,男,1970年9月15日出生于沈阳市皇姑区柳江街9号,身体健康。1977-1983年就读于沈阳市泰山路小学,198
上腹部见明显的蠕动波,波形自左向右移动,考虑为A.幽门梗阻 B.胆绞痛 C.
20、对现场的安全设施,应加强管理、及时完善、定期维护和保养,确保其安全性能和功
下列行为中,属于有偿法律行为的有()A.承揽合同 B.租赁合同 C.赠与合
下列说法中,正确的是( )。A.大赦既赦其刑,又赦其罪B.特赦只赦其刑
交纳保险费是()的基本义务。A.被保险人 B.投保人 C.保险人 D.受
具有综合力学性能、耐低温冲击韧性、焊接性能和冷热压加工性能良好的特性,可用于建筑
(2017年真题)施工企业对H市甲县生态环境局作出的罚款行为不服,可以向下列
最新回复
(
0
)