首页
登录
职称英语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested i
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested i
游客
2023-11-06
66
管理
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit (诉讼) in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. (They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes. ) The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know &40out any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question. [br] Child adoption is mentioned in the passage to show that ______.
选项
A、good will may sometimes complicate racial problems
B、social surroundings are vital to the healthy growth of children
C、intelligence testing also applies to non-academic areas
D、American opinion can shift when it comes to sensitive issues
答案
D
解析
要点理解题。对于具体事例的作用,一般可以看事例前面总括性的陈述。本篇文章作者在介绍儿童收养问题前提到“Unfortunately,intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject,and what the law al lows us to do varies from time to time.”然后说这种情况在其他场合也出现,如儿童收养。显然儿童收养问题所要说明的也是对于一些敏感的问题,法律所允许我们做的在不同的时期也不同。开始白人家庭收养黑人儿童是
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3162527.html
相关试题推荐
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedi
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
【C1】______thelackof【C2】______betweengiftedstudentsandtheirschools,it
随机试题
Weallhopethatthevaluesthatareimportanttoeachofusarepassedalon
A.胸腺瘤 B.淋巴瘤 C.神经细胞瘤 D.甲状旁腺瘤 E.良性畸胎瘤T
关于药物安全性评价的观点不正确的是A、分为实验室评价和临床评价两部分 B、药物
从政策沿革来看,行业出现产能过剩时,治理政策通常先从拉动内需的角度去设计。实际上
材料: 托班幼儿吃饭时普遍存在以下情况:不肯张嘴巴或不肯咀嚼吞咽。为解决这个问
关于城市设计和控制性详细规划的表述,下列哪些项是不准确的?()(2010年
生化汤中全当归的功用不包括A.补血活血 B.化瘀生新 C.行滞止痛 D.润
共用题干 一般资料:求助者,男性,13岁,小学六年级学生。案例介绍:求助者在四
声波的频率范围是()。 A.20~200HzB.20~2000H
视黄醇含量最多的食物是A.蔬菜 B.肉类 C.豆类 D.动物肝脏 E.粮
最新回复
(
0
)