首页
登录
职称英语
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being
游客
2023-10-11
89
管理
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used—and, in many cases, the only—source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teachers’ performance, the ratings must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what we’ve learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the students’ level, professional behaviour in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject. [br] What can we learn from the passage?
选项
A、Student evaluations of teachers are popular because they are very accurate.
B、In student ratings, students should not be asked questions that require professional background.
C、Student ratings can be used under any circumstances.
D、All colleges are inclined to use student ratings to evaluate teachers.
答案
B
解析
此类题一般考查文章的细节,因此在解答该类型题目时,一定要仔细研读各选项,看清楚选项与原文的异同。A)与第三段首句意思相悖;C)、D)中存在any和All两个绝对性词汇,并且原文中并未提及,也是干扰项;B)与第四段第三、四句含义一致,因此是正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3089195.html
相关试题推荐
[img]2016m3s/ct_eyyjsaz2013j_eyyjsaread_0551_20163[/img]Chesshaschangeda
[img]2016m3s/ct_eyyjsaz2013j_eyyjsaread_0551_20163[/img]Chesshaschangeda
[img]2016m3s/ct_eyyjsaz2013j_eyyjsaread_0551_20163[/img]Chesshaschangeda
NoticehowyoucanchangeMICEintoCATSinfourmoves,changingonlyoneletter
Changeoneletteronlyfromeachwordtoformawell-knownphrase.weailanya
WillRussiachangetheclocktowintertimethisautumn?[originaltext]Russiaha
Thefreezingpointisthetemperature_____waterchangesintoice.A、atwhichB、o
Ifwe_____timelychangestotheplan,agreatdealoftimeandmoneywouldhav
Itissaidthatthesuddenchangeinweather_____manypeople’shealth.A、hasaf
Everymonththegroupmeets,andsoitsmemberscan______theirviews.A、change
随机试题
尊敬的各位嘉宾,女士们、先生们:大家晚上好!很荣幸出席本次晚宴活动。本届论坛以“合作与共赢:构建亚洲命运共同体”为主题,准确绘制了
LastweekIwenttothetheatre.Ihadaverygoodseat.Theplaywasvery【1
社区获得性肺炎常见的病原菌包括()A.肺炎球菌 B.流感嗜血札杆菌 C.
均一性红细胞血尿与非均一性红细胞血尿的区别是:A.异形红细胞≥80% B.异形
某建筑物的外墙外边线尺寸为60m×8m,起重机采用外单侧布置,外脚手宽1.5m,
固体废物处理的基本思想是采取()处理,对固体废物产生的全过程进行控制。A、资
下列有关基金公司投资交易环节描述中,正确的是( )。A.形成投资策略、构建投资
《中国药典》规定紫外-可见分光光度计需定期进行校正,如何测定吸收度准确性A.用比
教师要适应时代发展需要,拓宽知识视野,更新知识结构,不断提高专业素养和教育教学水
风险价值法(VaR法)主要用于()的评估。A.信用风险 B.市场风险 C
最新回复
(
0
)