首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are
游客
2023-10-10
55
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as a nanny state whose social engineering has gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity (肥胖症) rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic (慢性的) diseases?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of the rich and the poor. Because its level of income disparity (差异) is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor than in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] In the author’s opinion, what is the purpose of Denmark’s exerting "fat tax"?
选项
A、To attract public advocates.
B、To set up a nanny state.
C、To stave off rising obesity rates.
D、To change medical conditions.
答案
C
解析
根据题干中的"fat tax"定位到第一段第三句。本句到本段末句指出目前丹麦政府因征收“脂肪税”而变得臭名昭著,并已经引起国际骚动,毁誉参半。第二段首句则指出作者认为它是一个国家想降低日益增长的肥胖率的尝试。it指上一段提出的“脂肪税”,因此C)最合理。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3086943.html
相关试题推荐
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyar
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
SeniorAccountExecutive(总监)Atlanta,aleadingmarketing,design&prod
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词yo
随机试题
Ourworldhasneverbeensosmallorsoflat,thankstotechnologiesthathavea
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessay.Youshouldsta
企业投资公路建设项目实施时,编制工程可行性研究报告后一步程序是()。A.编
健康保险行业引入健康管理服务与技术的最终目的是( )。A.促销保险产品 B.
在学生学了有关货币、消费及投资理财的相关知识后,某思想政治课教师设计了一个项目评
爆破器材运输时()。A、应避开人员密集地方 B、工作人员严禁穿化纤服装
损伤性血胸病人胸腔内积血不凝固的原因是A:出血量太大 B:凝血因子减少 C:
关于“通知”这一文种,下列说法错误的是:() A.通知因其使用频率较高,故
下列各项中,对于确诊恶性肿瘤最有意义的是 A.放射性核素扫描B.计算机X线断
某企业8月份工资分配如下:生产甲产品的工人工资46500元,生产乙产品的工人工资
最新回复
(
0
)