首页
登录
职称英语
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, us
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, us
游客
2023-09-02
80
管理
问题
For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, using science for the construction of what we call modern civilization. Every dispensable item of contemporary technology, from canal locks to dial telephones to penicillin, was pieced together from the analysis of data provided by one or another series of scientific experiments. Three hundred years seems a long time for testing a new approach to human interaction, long enough to settle back for critical appraisal of the scientific method, maybe even long enough to vote on whether to go on with it or not. There is an argument.
Voices have been raised in protest since the beginning, rising in pitch and violence in the nineteenth century during the early stages of the industrial revolution, summoning urgent crowds into the streets any day on the issue of nuclear energy. The principal discoveries in this century, all in all, are the glimpses of the depth of our ignorance about nature. Things that used to seem clear and rational, matters of absolute certainty—Newtonian mechanics, for example—have slipped through our fingers, and we are left with a new set of gigantic puzzles, cosmic uncertainties, ambiguities; some of the laws of physics are amended every few years, some are canceled outright, some undergo revised versions of legislative intent as if they were acts of Congress.
Just thirty years ago we call it a biological revolution when the fantastic geometry of the DNA molecule was exposed to public view and the linear language of genetics was decoded. For a while, things seemed simple and clear, the cell was a neat little machine, a mechanical device ready for taking to pieces and reassembling, like a tiny watch. But just in the last few years it has become almost unbelievably complex, filled with strange parts whose functions are beyond today’s imagining.
It is not just that there is more to do; there is everything to do. What lies ahead, or what can lie ahead if the efforts in basic research are continued, is much more than the conquest of human disease or the improvement of agricultural technology or the cultivation of nutrients in the sea. As we learn more about fundamental processes of living things in general we will learn more about ourselves. [br] What was hailed as a biological revolution thirty years ago?
选项
A、Discovery of the structure of DNA
B、The decoding of the linear language
C、The mechanical device found in the human cell
D、The unbelievable complexity of DNA
答案
B
解析
细节理解题。主要检测对第三段内容的理解。只有B项是30年前科学界欢呼的对象,而A,C,D项都是对本段文字的误解。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2978131.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Forcenturies,parrotshavebeenprizedpetsbecauseoftheir
[originaltext]Forcenturies,parrotshavebeenprizedpetsbecauseoftheir
[originaltext]Forcenturies,parrotshavebeenprizedpetsbecauseoftheir
[originaltext]Forcenturies,parrotshavebeenprizedpetsbecauseoftheir
[originaltext]Fullfacetransplantarenolongersciencefictionfantasy,
[originaltext]Fullfacetransplantarenolongersciencefictionfantasy,
[originaltext]Withthedevelopmentofscience,scientistshavediscoveredm
Foraboutthreecenturieswehavebeendoingscience,tryingscienceout,us
Foraboutthreecenturieswehavebeendoingscience,tryingscienceout,us
Todefinesciencewemaysimplycallit______.[br]Thebesttitleforthepass
随机试题
Womenknowthatalackofsleepleavesthemirritable.However,mostofthem
[originaltext]M:Youdon’tknowaboutmeisthatIusedtoweighanincredible
Wisebuyingisapositivewayinwhichyoucanmakeyourmoneygofurther.T
利用校对软件识别( )等方面的错误,效率较高。A.数字用法不统一 B.复音词
B
下列哪些指标不能反映心室肌前负荷有()A.平均动脉压(MAP) B.左室舒
已知2010年限额以上企业零售额增幅为27.4%,限额以下企业零售额增幅
患者,男性,66岁,诊断心绞痛入院,舌下含服硝酸甘油0.5mg后眼前发黑、恶心,
利用(),可判定某投资项目是否可行。A:财务净现值 B:财务内部收益率 C:
A.询问胸痛部位、性质、诱因、持续时间、缓解方式 B.超声心动图检查 C.冠
最新回复
(
0
)