首页
登录
职称英语
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in
游客
2023-08-18
50
管理
问题
About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed lawsuit(诉讼)in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test(They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes.)The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question. [br] The author’s opinion of child adoption seems to be that _____.
选项
A、no rules whatsoever can be prescribed
B、white families should adopt black children
C、adoption should be based on IQ test results
D、cross-racial adoption is to be advocated
答案
A
解析
根据文章第7段末句“因此,很难说到底怎样才是最好的。但肯定无疑的是,我们大家都需要有善意”,由此可推断,人们并不能制定某种规则来限制它,故此,A与文章的意思相符。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2937106.html
相关试题推荐
Howwelookandhowweappeartoothersprobablyworriesusmorewhenweare
Howwelookandhowweappeartoothersprobablyworriesusmorewhenweare
Howwelookandhowweappeartoothersprobablyworriesusmorewhenweare
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedin
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedin
Aboutthetimethatschoolsandothersquitereasonablybecameinterestedin
Whilethemissionofpublicschoolshasexpandedbeyondeducationtoinclude
[originaltext]Mostschoolsoffermusicandartclassestogivestudentsaw
[originaltext]Mostschoolsoffermusicandartclassestogivestudentsaw
[originaltext]Isyourfamilyinterestedinbuyingadog?Adogcanbeahap
随机试题
[originaltext]Thedangerfromearthquakesisveryreal—theyareprobablyth
函数y=ln(1+x2)的单调递增区间是( )
关于医疗用品的卫生标准,下列哪些是正确的()A.进入人体无菌组织、器官或接
A.脊柱中央后前按压 B.脊柱中央前后按压 C.单侧脊柱外侧后前按压 D.
充填采矿法的成本高,房柱采矿法的效率低、资源损失大,只有在不得已的情况下才采用。
引起猩红热的病原菌为()A.B群链球菌 B.金黄色葡萄球菌 C.甲型
施工单位在投标过程中,下列做法正确的是()。A、分部分项工程项目中的单价项目,应
下列关于滴眼剂的叙述错误的是A.滴眼剂指供滴眼用的澄明溶液或混悬液B.洗眼剂是配
【2018案例二~1】 背景资料 某安装公司中标了10台5000m3拱顶罐
患者男,40岁。因大量蛋白尿、高度水肿,诊断肾病综合征入院。肾穿活检病理为:微小
最新回复
(
0
)