2. 学历类
  3. In order to “change lives for the better

In order to “change lives for the better

admin2022-08-02  37
问题 In order to “change lives for the better” and reduce “dependency,” George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the “upfront work search” scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the job centre with a CV, register for online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?　More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on,” he claimed. “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand, was his zeal for “fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.　Losing a job is hurting: you don’t skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.　But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever-tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase “jobseeker’s allowance” is about redefining the unemployed as a “jobseeker” who had no fundamental right to a benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited “allowance,” conditional on actively seeking a job; no entitlement and no insurance, at ￡71.70 a week, one of the least generous in the EU.What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme?A. A desire to secure a better life for allB. An eagerness to protect the unemployedC. An urge to be generous to the claimantsD. A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers
选项 A. A desire to secure a better life for all
B. An eagerness to protect the unemployed
C. An urge to be generous to the claimants
D. A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers
答案 D
解析 细节题。定位到第二段后半部分。本段第八句指出推动奥斯本实施该计划的动力是他对“基本社会公平”（fundamental fairness）的热忱即保护纳税人的利益，控制政府支出以及确保最需要领取救济金的申请人得到失业救济金。因此，本题答案应为D项。passion与zeal属于同义替换。“On first hearing”表明后面的表述是与事实不相符的，因此A项错误。奥斯本制定该计划是希望通过改革来鼓励失业者去找工作，不能说是“保护”，故B项错误；C项的generous“慷慨的”与文章意思相悖，该计划实际上是对申领者更加严格了，C项错误。
转载请注明原文地址:http://tihaiku.com/xueli/2699033.html
本试题收录于： 英语一研究生题库研究生入学分类

英语一研究生

研究生入学

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)