首页
登录
职称英语
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading
游客
2025-02-16
13
管理
问题
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.
Attitudes to language
It is not easy to be systematic and objective about language study. Popular linguistic debate regularly deteriorates into invective and polemic. Language belongs to everyone, so most people feel they have a right to hold an opinion about it. And when opinions differ, emotions can run high. Arguments can start as easily over minor points of usage as over major policies of linguistic education.
Language, moreover, is a very public behaviour, so it is easy for different usages to be noted and criticised. No part of society or social behaviour is exempt: linguistic factors influence how we judge personality, intelligence, social status, educational standards, job aptitude, and many other areas of identity and social survival. As a result, it is easy to hurt, and to be hurt, when language use is unfeelingly attacked.
In its most general sense, prescriptivism is the view that one variety of language has an inherently higher value than others, and that this ought to be imposed on the whole of the speech community. The view is propounded especially in relation to grammar and vocabulary, and frequently with reference to pronunciation. The variety which is favoured, in this account, is usually a version of the ’standard’ written language, especially as encountered in literature, or in the formal spoken language which most closely reflects this style. Adherents to this variety are said to speak or write ’correctly’; deviations from it are said to be ’incorrect!
All the main languages have been studied prescriptively, especially in the 18th century approach to the writing of grammars and dictionaries. The aims of these early grammarians were threefold: (a) they wanted to codify the principles of their languages, to show that there was a system beneath the apparent chaos of usage, (b) they wanted a means of settling disputes over usage, and (c) they wanted to point out what they felt to be common errors, in order to ’improve’ the language. The authoritarian nature of the approach is best characterised by its reliance on ’rules’ of grammar. Some usages are ’prescribed’, to be learnt and followed accurately; others are ’proscribed,’ to be avoided. In this early period, there were no half-measures: usage was either right or wrong, and it was the task of the grammarian not simply to record alternatives, but to pronounce judgement upon them.
These attitudes are still with us, and they motivate a widespread concern that linguistic standards should be maintained. Nevertheless, there is an alternative point of view that is concerned less with standards than with the facts of linguistic usage. This approach is summarised in the statement that it is the task of the grammarian to describe, not prescribe - to record the facts of linguistic diversity, and not to attempt the impossible tasks of evaluating language variation or halting language change. In the second half of the 18th century, we already find advocates of this view, such as Joseph Priestley, whose Rudiments of English Grammar (1761) insists that ’the custom of speaking is the original and only just standard of any language! Linguistic issues, it is argued, cannot be solved by logic and legislation. And this view has become the tenet of the modern linguistic approach to grammatical analysis.
In our own time, the opposition between ’descriptivists’ and ’prescriptivists’ has often become extreme, with both sides painting unreal pictures of the other. Descriptive grammarians have been presented as people who do not care about standards, because of the way they see all forms of usage as equally valid. Prescriptive grammarians have been presented as blind adherents to a historical tradition. The opposition has even been presented in quasi-political terms - of radical liberalism vs elitist conservatism.
Questions 1-8
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 1?
In boxes 1-8 on your answer sheet, write
YES if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this [br] Prescriptivism still exists today.
选项
A、YES
B、NO
C、NOT GIVEN
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3959531.html
相关试题推荐
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions27-40,whicharebasedonReading
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions27-40,whicharebasedonReading
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions14~26,whicharebasedonReading
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions14~26,whicharebasedonReading
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions14~26,whicharebasedonReading
Whatisthewriter’spurposeinReadingPassage1?A、toargueinfavourofapart
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions1-13,whicharebasedonReading
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions1-13,whicharebasedonReading
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions1-13,whicharebasedonReading
DothefollowingstatementsagreewiththeviewsofthewriterinReadingPassag
随机试题
In1940,ErnestHemingwaypublishedthenovelentitled______whichisabouttheS
Americanculturehasnotbeenimmunetoculturalinfluencesfromoutside.Th
施工控制网建立 1)工程概述 ××核电二期工程是中国自行设计建造的大型商用压
按崩解时限检查法检查,普通片剂应在多长时间内崩解A.20min B.15min
国家对农村“五保户”给予的物质帮助属于()。A.社会保险 B.社会福利
“仓廪实而知礼节,衣食足而知荣辱。”这句话反映了人的需要具有( )A.整体性
超限效应,是指当人们所接受的刺激过多,过强或者作用时间过久时,引起的心理极不耐烦
(2014年真题)某居民企业为服装生产企业,因无法准确核算成本支出,被税务机关确
在工程施工中,总监理工程师应及时签发工程暂停令的情形有()。A.建设单位要
患者,9岁,学生。1月底因突起高热、剧烈头痛、恶心伴非喷射性呕吐1次入院。体检:
最新回复
(
0
)