The question of what children learn and how they should learn it is continua

游客2025-02-02 8

问题 The question of what children learn and how they should learn it is continually being debated and redebated. Nobody dares any longer to defend the old system, the learning of lessons parrot-fashion and the grammar with-a-whip system, which was good enough for our grandparents. The theorists of modem psychology have stepped in to argue that we must understand the needs of children. Children are not just small adults; they are children who must be respected as such.
Well, you may say, this is as it should be, and a good idea. But think further. What happens? "Education" becomes the responsibility not of teachers, but of psychologists. What happens then? Teachers worry too much about the psychological implications of their lessons, and forget about the subjects themselves. If a child dislikes a lesson, the teacher feels that it is his fault, not the child’s. So teachers worry whether history is "relevant" to modem young children. And do they dare to recount stories about violent battles? Or will this make the children themselves violent? Can they tell their classes about children of different races, or will this encourage racial hatred? Why teach children to write grammatical sentences? Verbal expression is better. Sums? Arithmetic? No, no; real-life mathematical situations are more understandable.
You see you can go too far. Influenced by educational theorists, who have nothing better to do than write books about their ideas, teachers leave their teacher-training colleges filled with grand, psychological ideas about children and their needs. They make elaborate, sophisticated preparations and try out their "modem methods" on the long-suffering children. Since one "modem method" rapidly replaces another, the poor kids will have had a good bellyful by the time they leave school. Frequently the modem methods are so sophisticated that they fail to be understood by the teachers, let alone the children; even more often, the relaxed discipline, so essential for the "informal" feeling the class must have, prevents all but a handful of children from learning anything. [br] What do the modem psychologists maintain?

选项 A、Children must be understood and respected.
B、Children are small adults and know what they need.
C、Children are better off without learning lessons.
D、Education of children is the responsibility of psychologists.

答案 A

解析细节题型见第一段最后二句：The theorists of modern psychology have stepped in to argue that we must understand the needs of children. Children are not just small adults; they are children who must be respected as such．(现代的心理学家开始争辩说，我们要理解孩子们的需求。他们不仅仅是年少的成人，他们还是我们必须像尊重成人一样尊重的孩子。)因此答案为A(现代心理学家主张要理解并尊重孩子)。

转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3939513.html

相关试题推荐

随机试题

最新回复(0)

The question of what children learn and how they should learn it is continua

Itiscommonlyagreedthatallgovernmentsshouldtakeimmediatemeasurestoend

Ifindthatmostchildren’sbooksareaboutboys,menandmaleanimals,andmost