首页
登录
职称英语
Demonstrators rally at Los Angeles City Hall during the first Women’s March,
Demonstrators rally at Los Angeles City Hall during the first Women’s March,
游客
2025-01-18
18
管理
问题
Demonstrators rally at Los Angeles City Hall during the first Women’s March, held on Jan. 21, 2017, one day after President Trump’s inauguration. The march drew hundreds of thousands of participants in L. A. An event organized to bring women together is proving to be
much more divisive than intended
. The annual women’s march in Eureka has been canceled after organizers decided the planning committee was too white. The move has prompted newfound criticism of the global gatherings that were launched two years ago in protest of the inauguration of President Trump. Many have said the marches are not diverse enough and have accused the organization of being anti-Semitic and homophobic.
The Eureka group, which is not an official Women’s March chapter, said that instead of the planned Jan. 19 march, it will focus on organizing an event for March 9, in conjunction with International Women’s Day. The move will allow more time to reach out to women of color and those who identify as
gender nonconforming
, organizers said in a Facebook post last week. "The local organizers are continuing to meet and discuss how to broaden representation in the organizing committee to create an event that represents and supports peoples who live here" in Humboldt County, an organizer said in the post. "Up to this point, the participants have been overwhelmingly white, lacking representation from several perspectives in our community."
The decision made by a handful of women in the small town of Eureka—which Census data show is 71% non-Hispanic white—drew mixed reactions, both locally and across the country. Supporters were thrilled the group was taking steps toward increasing its diversity and inclusion. Others, however, said the move was a criticism of people of color for not joining in and that by postponing the march, organizers were placing the burden on participants to make the local women’s march appear less white. "I have deep concerns that people of color are being used as a
crutch
for the organizing committee failing to do the work it takes to encourage diversity," Caterina Kein wrote on Facebook. "Please do not blame ’us’ for your failures."
The backlash prompted Women’s March Eureka to release a second statement on Monday noting the decision to cancel the event was based on the lack of diversity among the group’s leadership, not among the march’s attendees. In an interview with KHSU-FM radio, organizer Kelsey Reedy said the original organizers were all white women and that only two recent additions have increased the diversity of the small group. "It wasn’t just we felt there wasn’t enough representation. There literally was no representation," she said.
The organizers acknowledged that past attempts at being inclusive have been shallow. "We could have done a lot more," Reedy said. "We did not push ourselves to really create a space that was welcoming for everyone to be involved. We did reach out to several groups led by people of color, but only having a few people in the group that even had those connections means it was pretty limited."
The larger Women’s March organization has faced other problems, including accusations of being anti-Semitic. Leaders of the national group came under fire last year after co-chair Tamika Mallory attended a February event with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, in which he said, "The powerful Jews are my enemy." Between March and November, the larger group issued three statements in response to criticism that Women’s March leaders are anti-Semitic and homophobic, but it has repeatedly expressed support for its leaders, including Mallory. "It’s become clear, amidst this media storm, that our values and our message have—too often—been lost," the national group said. "That loss caused a lot of harm, and a lot of pain. We should have been faster and clearer in helping people understand our values and our commitment to fighting anti-Semitism. We regret that."
(选自《洛杉矶时报》2019年1月3日) [br] What’s the main idea of the last paragraph?
选项
A、Women’s March leaders had bad words towards Jews.
B、Women’s March have a strong dislike of homosexuals.
C、Women’s March has faced problems like anti-Semitism and homophobic.
D、The organization regretted to fight anti-Semitism.
答案
C
解析
主旨题。本文最后一段讨论了妇女游行面临的其他问题,如反犹太和恐同的指控,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3918209.html
相关试题推荐
Duringthe________oftherain,shereturnedhomeimmediately.A、spinB、flickC、lu
Duringthe________oftherain,shereturnedhomeimmediately.A、spinB、flickC、lu
Thestudentwasrebukedforplayingpranksduringtheclass.A、cribsB、quipsC、di
Duringthe________oftherain,shereturnedhomeimmediately.A、spinB、flickC、lu
TheU-boatblockade________England’sfoodshortageduringWorldWarII.A、aggrega
Everydepartmenthashadtheirbudget________duringthefinancialcrisis.A、incre
DuringJapan’srevolutioninthe19thcentury,theJapanesedenouncedtheirown
DemonstratorsrallyatLosAngelesCityHallduringthefirstWomen’sMarch,
DemonstratorsrallyatLosAngelesCityHallduringthefirstWomen’sMarch,
DemonstratorsrallyatLosAngelesCityHallduringthefirstWomen’sMarch,
随机试题
[originaltext]Q:Hello.Isthisyourmanager’soffice?[/originaltext][original
玻璃钢防眩板生产工艺流程为:原材料准备及检验→压制→脱模定型→磨边打孔→成品检验
患者男性,54岁,确诊为乙肝后肝硬化6年,腹胀伴双下肢浮肿1个月,加重伴无尿2天
高血压健康促进规划的近期和中期效果评价应评估A.人群高血压的患病率 B.高血压
我国学前教育在亚太地区属于比较好的,20世纪末统计3~6岁幼儿入园率约为( )
头晕眼花,两目干涩,胁肋隐隐灼痛,面部烘热,潮热盗汗,舌红少苔,脉细数者,属A.
关于细菌L型,下列哪一项是错的A.细菌L型是遗传性变异的细菌B.细胞壁的缺陷主要
初产妇26岁,妊娠40周,宫口开全,胎头拨露已1.5小时无进展,胎心率为150次
一般资料:求助者,廖某,女性,26岁,某外企翻译。 案例介绍:求助者一年以前
一扩张型心肌病患者,心率80次/分,心律不规整,肝大肋下3.Ocm,下肢轻度水肿
最新回复
(
0
)