2. 职称英语
  3. "There are too many students overcrowding courses and contributing nothing to

"There are too many students overcrowding courses and contributing nothing to

游客2025-01-03  13
问题    "There are too many students overcrowding courses and contributing nothing to society," says Professor Edward Mishan, explaining the subject of an article, published recently in an economics journal.
   Using pure economic rationality, Professor Mishan argues that subsidizing students because they benefit society is a fallacy--one that he says he would have included in his book 21 Popular Economic Fallacies, had he thought of it when it was first published in 1970.
   "For if higher education is free," he writes, "a man who chooses to spend three years at university rather than enter the workforce may be willing to do so even though it makes no perceptible difference to his future earnings."
   As such he advocates full commercial rates on loans for students to pay the entire costs of their higher education..
   Professor Mandy Telford is not amused. "There is no doubt that charging commercial interest rates on loans would put people off going to university," she said.
   "At present we have a system where the poorest students are forced to work long hours just to keep their heads above water, while the rich, supported by their parents, are able to make greater use of their time. Commercial rate loans would hit the poorest students the hardest as they would be forced to borrow the most. After graduation all students would be forced to chase a fast buck to escape the burden of their ever-increasing debts, therefore shunning lower paid jobs in a public sector that is crying out for skilled teachers and nurses, "Ms. Telford added.
   One effect of subsidizing university studies, claims Professor Mishan, is that "bizarre and outlandish" courses are likely to proliferate.
   "In some courses (possibly medicine, electrical engineering and accounting), the respective IRRs (internal rate of return) may be well above that on commercial investment, whereas in others (possibly psychology, sociology and gender studies), they would be well below," he writes.
   On psychology, sociology, and gender studies, he says, "you learn a few terms you throw into a conversation but nothing more, this is not a good allocation of resources."
   Lynne Segal, professor of psychology and gender studies at Birkbeck College, is nearly amused. "This is amazing.  All we hear about is people complaining about boys and masculinity--lower exam results, more crime," she said.
   "Mental illness amongst men is rising and depression these are economic issues as well. He seems to be negating the study of human behaviour.  It’s a bit hard to take seriously," she added.
   Professor Mishan was a professor of economics at London School of Economics until 1977, after which he moved to America.  Since then he has been "a little bit out of economics",  says professor Colin Robinson,  editor of economic affairs,  the journal produced by the Institute of Economic Affairs, which published the paper.
   But Professor Mishan does sound amused about his paper. This is not my field of competence--it’s just bit of fun," he reassures us. [br] We can learn from the passage that Professor Mishan______.
选项 A、expressed his object, off to subsidizing students as early as 1970s’
B、takes mentality int. o consideration in his paper of economic issues
C、has always been highly regarded as an authority in economics
D、may not regard his paper on the issue of subsidizing students as academic
答案 D
解析 第二段的意思是：Professor Mishan使用纯经济唯理性驳斥了“因为学生对社会有益所以要给他们提供津贴”这一谬论。他还说如果他早点知道这一谬论，就会在他70年代出版的书中收入这个谬论。由此看来，A和B都不正确。注意“had he thought of it”使用了虚拟语气。倒数第二段谈到1977年后Professor Mishan已经不进行经济学研究了(since then he has been“a little bit out of economics”)，因此C也不正确。而倒数第一段提到Professor Mishan评论自己的论文：这并不是我所专长的——但这很有趣(this is not my field of competence—it’s just bit of fun)。因此应选D，即他不认为自己写的论文有多大学术价值。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3897233.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)