首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he
游客
2024-12-16
28
管理
问题
Towards the end of Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £30--though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1,286 in every 10,000 people", than to say it kills "24. 14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager; flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above(and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles(such as a 50-50 chance to win $200 or lose $100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others.
Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch, Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics(with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] Which of the following statements is TRUE of the human brain?
选项
A、In most cases, System 1 is working.
B、System 2 works to lead to mistakes.
C、System 2 is preferred by rational people.
D、System 2 is more complex than System 1.
答案
A
解析
细节题。由选项中的System 1和System 2定位至第四段。末句指出“System 2 kicks…to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.”,这说明更多的时候,是让受直觉影响的系统一来替我们作决定,[A]符合文意,故为答案。由第四段第三句可知,导致错误的是系统一,非系统二,排除[B];由第四句可知,文章并未说理性之人喜欢系统二,[C]为过度推断,排除;第四段末句只是说系统二更适用于处理复杂问题。该段分别介绍了系统一、系统二的特点,在第五段还具体分析了系统一的优点,并未比较两个系统哪个更复杂,[D]无依据,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3877123.html
相关试题推荐
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
Tosomeextent,theRomanticMovementrevealeda______attitudetowardsthesoc
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamon
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamon
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamon
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamon
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamon
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamong
随机试题
Adaptability,ortheabilitytoadjusttoavarietyofdifferentcircumstanc
中国的饺子是春节最重要的食物之一.由于它们的形状类似于古代金银元宝(ingot),因此它们象征着财富。家人们会在除夕夜聚在一起来包饺子。他们会在一个饺子
BLOCKADE:OBSTRUCTION::A、breezeway:wallB、pillar:supportC、mortar:skyscrap
"ResourcesandIndustrialisminCanada"Whilethemuch-anticipatedexpansion
Nothingcanbewasted,andweare____________(从不为有多余的食物困扰)becausewehavenever
某公司签署的服务器运维项目的核算表如下所示,该项目已结项,其投资回报率为(
()以下的糖溶液一般不会对微生物的生长起抑制作用。A.5% B.10% C
患者女性,40岁,因患肺结核长期服抗结核药治疗,出现视野缩小、绿视等,确诊为药物
某大型肉食品加工厂有员工3200人,主要生产生鲜及冷冻食品。厂内有厂房、锅炉房、
建设项目的环境影响评价文件自批准之日起超过五年,方决定该项目开工建设的,其环境影
最新回复
(
0
)