首页
登录
职称英语
Theories of HistoryI. How much we know about history?
Theories of HistoryI. How much we know about history?
游客
2024-11-05
1
管理
问题
Theories of History
I. How much we know about history?
A. 【T1】________ exist for only a fraction of man’s time 【T1】________
B. The accuracy of these records is often 【T2】________ , 【T2】________
and 【T3】________ often needs improvement. 【T3】________
II. Reconstruction of history before writing
A. being difficult because of the 【T4】________ of history to us 【T4】________
B. the most that we can do is: use 【T5】________ 【T5】________
and the knowledge of the habits of animals.
Ⅲ. Theories about history
A. Objective: impossible to 【T6】________ the beginning and 【T6】________
【T7】________ the end of man’s story. 【T7】________
B. One theory believes that man continually 【T8】________ . 【T8】________
—【T9】________ must be more intelligent and civilized 【T9】________
than his ancestors. —Human race will evolve into a race of 【T10】________ . 【T10】________
C. The second theory holds the man’s history is like a 【T11】________ 【T11】________
of development.
—Modern man is not 【T12】________ . 【T12】________
—Modern man may be inferior to members of 【T13】________ . 【T13】________
D. The third theory: Human societies 【T14】________ a cycle of stages, 【T14】________
but overall progress is【T15】________ in the long historical perspective. 【T15】________ [br] 【T12】
Theories of History
Good morning, class. Today’s lecture is mainly concerned with some theories of history.
How much of man’s history do we know? We really know very little. Written records exist for only a fraction of what we suppose to have been man’s time as a unique species. Furthermore, the accuracy of these records is often suspected, and the scope and selection of significant detail in them often needs improvement.
It is worse when we try to reconstruct man’s history before the development of writing, and this is unfortunate because the history of the greatest discoveries, such as fire, the wheel and the sail, as well as the history of the early development of human society are lost to us. The most that we can do is to use traces, deduction, speculation and the knowledge we have of the habits of those animals which have elementary social order to help us make a partial reconstruction. This is hardly a satisfactory substitute for precise information.
With our knowledge of human history, which is only fragmentary at best, it is therefore nearly impossible to reconstruct the beginning and to deduce the end of the story of man. Thus, there have developed many schools of thought on the subject, each of which attempts to give coherence to the human past by fitting it into the framework of a theory of history.
Now, let’s take a look at one of these theories, it is assumed that man continually progress. He has evolved from a lower to a higher form of being, and he continues to evolve. This evolution takes place both in terms of his potentials and his abilities to actualize these potentials. If one holds this theory, one feels that modern man must be more intelligent and civilized today than his ancestors, as well as physically and morally superior to them. One further assumes that this progress will continue into an ever more glorious future. Here deduction often ends and dreams of utopia begin, for it seems that most of us find it hard to think of the human race developing into a race of angels. All in all, as theory of history, the above view has had many eminent supporters.
It might be well to mention here a variation on this theory that used to be popular, namely the idea that man rose from a low condition to a Golden Age at some time in the remote past, and that things have gone straight downhill ever since. Many eminent men have found a sort of gloomy comfort in this idea, but science has now opened up possibilities for the future which make this theory less defendable. Perhaps for this reason the theory has little modern support.
A second theory of history is held by those men who see man’s history as something quite different from a simple progression from a lower to a higher state. They see it as a cycle of stages of development, which are predictable in their broad outlines and main features. As surely as a civilization rises and comes into being, so also must it decline and fall. The chief pattern one sees in history is the rise and fall of civilization. Man, according to this theory, is warlike in one stage of his history and humane in another. This is not due to individual human beings or to general progress, but rather to determining socioeconomic patterns that are not, as yet, understood. To holders of this theory, modern man is not looked upon as the most superior social being yet produced. He is simply the typical product of the current stage in the cycle of our civilization. In fact, he may actually be inferior to members of past civilizations. It all depends upon what stage of civilization we happen to be living in. Indeed, it has been said that the average modern literate city dweller is comparatively more ignorant of his era’s fund of knowledge than other literate city dwellers of the past. While the staggering fund of knowledge in our technologically advanced world is undoubtedly greater than that of any past civilization, it is probably true that the average modern man, relying on such repetitive forms of entertainment as television and working in a narrowly specialized job, knows a great deal less sheer information about his world than did earlier people.
In a third theory of history, the two above theories are to some degree reconciled. According to this theory, which is often termed the spiral view of history, human societies do repeat a cycle of stages, but overall progress is observable in the long historical perspective. Civilizations do rise and fall, as the advocates of the second theory maintain, but the new civilization which replaces the first, usually by conquest, contains superior qualities which enable it to rise to a higher stage of development until it declines and is replaced by yet a third civilization.
The above theories interpret history in term of the overall progress of mankind in general without respect to differentiation within the social order. It is also possible to view human history in terms of the interaction of socioeconomic groups. Human history, according to this theory, is most clearly interpreted as the disappearance of class struggle. Most people who hold this theory assume a resolution of the struggle through the disappearance of class differences, although it would be just as correct to assume that the struggle could continue unresolved. Those who assume that the struggle can eventually be resolved hold that history has a goal and that progress can be measured in terms of how quickly mankind is reaching that goal.
选项
答案
the most superior
解析
第二种理论认为,人类并不是社会生物中最高级的,答案填the most superior。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3832016.html
相关试题推荐
Chinahasthefastest-ageingpopulationinhumanhistorybutthestatep
TheoriesofHistoryI.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?
TheoriesofHistoryI.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?
TheoriesofHistoryI.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?
TheoriesofHistoryI.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?
TheoriesofHistoryI.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?
TheoriesofHistoryI.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?
TheoriesofHistoryI.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?
TheoriesofHistoryI.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?
TheoriesofHistoryI.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?
随机试题
"BusinessClass"[img]2012q1/ct_etoefm_etoeflistz_1373_20121[/img][br]Accordin
MorphologyisastudyofA、theinternalstructureofwordsandtherulesthatgov
[audioFiles]audio_eufm_j97_001(20082)[/audioFiles]A、Hiscarturnedoverinana
消防应急广播在环境噪声大于60dB的场所设置的扬声器,在其播放范围内最远点的播放
内贮压式七氟丙烷灭火系统瓶组在20℃时贮存压力不包含下列哪种规格()MPa。
在接地装置中,接地方式可以分为()。A.防雷接地 B.工作接地 C.保护接
具有虚幻性、盲目性和狂热性的信仰,属于()A、非科学信仰 B、宗教信仰
可治疗神经衰弱的药物是A.五味子B.山茱萸C.益母草D.远志E.三七
基金财务会计报告分析可以达到的目的包括()。 A.评价基金过去的经营业绩及投
患者,女,20岁。素体肺肾阴精亏虚,肺痨病史2年,症见咳嗽咳血,体弱,神疲乏力,
最新回复
(
0
)