首页
登录
职称英语
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the En
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the En
游客
2024-09-29
44
管理
问题
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language . It has been argued that some of the vocabulary and grammar we use reflects and reinforces a traditional view of the world as one in which men are dominant and women play a secondary role.
Take the word "chairman" , for example. While this can in fact apply to people of both sexes, it appears to some people to be male-oriented as it ends in "man". In the past people taking the role of chairman were exclusively male, and the word was obviously originally a compound of "chair" and "man". Many English speakers, however, have ceased to view this word as a compound and no more feel it to be composed of two units, "chair" and "man", than they perceive "cupboard" as composed of "cup" and "board". In addition the continued use of chairman might be defended on the grounds that the final syllable is pronounced /m’n/ rather than /msn/, just like the final syllable of woman. Despite such considerations other speakers take a contrary view and are sensitive to the components of which it is made up. They clearly perceive it as a title which perpetuates traditional ideas about the place of women in society. For this reason they seek to replace it with neutral terms such as "chairperson" or "chair" , so that it is now possible to ask questions such as; "Who is chair of the committee?"
Other changes advocated include the replacement of words such as "postman" , "fireman" and "policeman" with more clearly neutral terms such as "postal worker", "firefighter" and "police officer". There is, however, continuing controversy about how far such language changes should go. Should changes also be considered to traditional idioms such as "man in the street" and titles such as "Peking Man"? Wrhat about those words where the male meaning of "man" is no longer dominant, such as "manhandle"?
To the extent that changes have taken place, they have done so more in the written language and formal pronouncements than in everyday speech. You would be quite likely to read in the paper that "Postal workers are to receive a pay increase". But "Has the postman been?" would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation. Here "postman" remains firmly entrenched in popular usage.
The lack of a sex-neutral third-person singular in English has also attracted attention. How, for example, do we fill in the blank in the following sentence? "A good teacher always makes sure is well prepared for the lesson. " Traditionally, this would be filled in with "he". The male pronoun in such cases is clearly intended to refer to both sexes. It is still widely used in this way, but some people, especially women, dislike it. They may prefer to add the female pronoun to the male, as in " A good teacher always makes sure he or she is well prepared for the lesson". Some people, however, feel that this looks and sounds awkward. Another solution is to use the plural "they" for the singular; "A good teacher always makes sure they are well prepared for the lesson. " This is often heard in conversation, but is less frequent in formal written English. More cautious souls can avoid the problem altogether by rephrasing in the plural: " Good teachers always make sure they are well prepared for the lesson. "
The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture. Chinese, Japanese, Persian and Turkish do not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns, but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English! [br] To what extent does the language reflect and shape attitudes and behaviors?
选项
A、They are closely related.
B、It is a matter of conjecture.
C、They have nothing to do with each other.
D、Only in English they are closely related.
答案
B
解析
细节题。从文章最后一段首句“The extent to which language reflects and shapesattitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture.”可以看出,语言在某种程度上反映和塑造讲话者的态度和举止只是一种推测,所以[B]是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3779100.html
相关试题推荐
Ireallyappreciate______metogetoutofthetroublesthatIranintorecentl
AnundergraduateofEnglishatauniversity,inarecentlettertotheunive
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEn
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEn
Whatisthebesttitleforthispassage?[originaltext]Recentlyafive-year
IrecentlyreadtheOxford【C1】______oftheTolstoy’sWarandPeace,trans
IrecentlyreadtheOxford【C1】______oftheTolstoy’sWarandPeace,trans
IrecentlyreadtheOxford【C1】______oftheTolstoy’sWarandPeace,trans
IrecentlyreadtheOxford【C1】______oftheTolstoy’sWarandPeace,trans
IrecentlyreadtheOxford【C1】______oftheTolstoy’sWarandPeace,trans
随机试题
AUSEnergyDepartmentreportcallsforincentivestoboostcoal-firedandnu
它位于浙江省省会杭州,水域面积约6平方公里。LocatedinHangzhou,provincialcapitalofZhejiangProvin
Althoughclichés(陈词滥调)aboutthe"vulnerability"ofwomenintheeconomyha
羊水细胞培养作染色体核型分析时,抽取羊水的时间为A.妊娠16~20周 B.妊娠
下列关于IL-2的生物学作用叙述,错误的是A.以自分泌和旁分泌发挥作用B.能被活
常见的沉积岩有( )。 A、辉绿岩 B、泥岩 C、石灰岩 D、白
某儿童福利院院长与外地一家著名公司的总经理是高中同学。“六一”儿童节前夕,他上门
Recently,Xiangningstartedtocommunicat
崩解剂选择不当A.裂片 B.黏冲 C.片重差异不合格 D.含量均匀度不符合
下列关于税收管辖权表述正确的是()。A.税收管辖权是对国际间所得征税的依据
最新回复
(
0
)