首页
登录
职称英语
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scient
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scient
游客
2024-05-29
11
管理
问题
There is a phenomena ill the present. The average number of authors on scientific papers is skyrocketing. What is the main reason for it? That’s partly because labs are bigger, problems are more complicated, and more different subspecialties are needed. But it’s also because US government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have started to promote "team science". As physics developed in the post-World War Ⅱ era, federal funds built expensive national facilities, and these served as surfaces on which collaborations could crystallize naturally.
Yet multiple authorship--however good it may be in other ways presents for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is research misconduct, should tile liability be joint and several, accruing to all authors? If not, then how should it be allocated among them? If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review?
Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author’s particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road. Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names, agonize over whether a much cited paper was really the candidate’s work or a coauthor’s, and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility.
Problems of this kind change the argument, supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles. After all, if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions, then the judges better know what they did. But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole, whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field, a team is a team, and the members should share the credit or the blame. [br] According to the passage, authorship is important when ______.
选项
A、practical or impractical suggestions of the authors are considered
B、appointments and promotions of the authors are involved
C、evaluators need to review the publication of the authors
D、the publication of the authors has become much-cited
答案
B
解析
细节推断题。原文指出,一旦到了大学委员会涉及任命与晋升时,作者署名将变得至关重要,对于这个问题。就会产生一种不同的看法,不过也许是解决的方法,故B)正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3610174.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Scientistssaysharkshavelivedintheworld’soceansformi
[originaltext]Scientistssaysharkshavelivedintheworld’soceansformi
[originaltext]Scientistssaysharkshavelivedintheworld’soceansformi
ClimateChangeScientistspredictincreasi
ClimateChangeScientistspredictincreasi
ClimateChangeScientistspredictincreasi
ClimateChangeScientistspredictincreasi
TheEuropeanUnionhadapprovedanumberofgeneticallymodifiedcropsuntil
TheEuropeanUnionhadapprovedanumberofgeneticallymodifiedcropsuntil
TheEuropeanUnionhadapprovedanumberofgeneticallymodifiedcropsuntil
随机试题
IwentonahungerstrikefortwoyearsbecausenoonewouldtellmethatwhyI
2000多年前,亚欧大陆(Eurasia)上勤劳勇敢的人民,探索出多条连接亚欧非几大文明的贸易和人文交流通路,后人将其统称为“丝绸之路”。千百年来,“和
PeerMediation(调解)onCampusThingshavenotgonewellla
监理工程师在进行进度控制时,属于组织措施的是()A.鼓励技术创新 B.严
某施工现场年平均雷暴日为73天,则在该现场内作业的门式起重机高度至少是( )m
黄遵宪诗曰“国初海禁严,立意比驱鳄。借端累无辜,此事实大错”。这首诗批判的是(
对模型的最小二乘回归结果显示,R2为0.92,总离差平方和为500,则残差平方和
甲公司以900万元的价格对外转让一项无形资产(专利权)。该项无形资产系甲公司
共用题干 物业企业给不交纳物业费的业主发法律函、起诉业主,已成了许多物业企业对
附条件合同中所附的条件必须符合下列()的要求。A、条件必须是将来发生的事实B、
最新回复
(
0
)