首页
登录
职称英语
Over the past decade, American companies have tried hard to find ways to dis
Over the past decade, American companies have tried hard to find ways to dis
游客
2024-04-18
68
管理
问题
Over the past decade, American companies have tried hard to find ways to discourage senior managers from feathering their own nests at the expense of their shareholders. The three most popular reforms have been recruiting more outside directors in order to make boards more independent, linking bosses’ pay to various performance measure, and giving bosses share options so that they have the same long-term interests as their shareholders.
These reforms have been widely adopted by America’s larger companies, and surveys suggest that many more companies are thinking of following their lead. But have they done any good? Three papers presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management in Boston this week suggest not. As is usually the case with boardroom tinkering, the consequences have differed from those intended.
Start with those independent boards. On the face of it, dismissing the boss’s friends from the board and replacing them with outsiders looks a perfect way to make senior managers more accountable. But that is not the conclusion of a study by Professor James Westphal. Instead, he found that bosses with a boardroom full of outsiders spend much of their time building alliances, doing personal favors and generally pleasing the outsiders.
All too often, these seductions succeed. Mr. Westphal found that, to a remarkable degree, " independent" boards pursue strategies that are likely to favor senior managers rather than shareholders. Such companies diversify their business, increase the pay of executives and weaken the link between pay and performance.
To assess the impact of performance related pay, Mr. Westphal asked the bosses of 103 companies with sales of over $1 billion what measurements were used to determine their pay. The measurements varied widely, ranging from sales to earnings per share. But the researcher’s big discovery was that bosses attend to measures that affect their own incomes and ignore or play down other factors that affect a company’s overall success.
In short, bosses are quick to turn every imaginable system of corporate government to their advantage which is probably why they are the people who are put in charge of things. Here is a paradox for the management theorists; any boss who cannot beat a system designed to keep him under control is probably not worth having. [br] How does the author feel about the efforts to control senior executives?
选项
A、Doubtful.
B、Indifferent.
C、Positive.
D、Approving.
答案
A
解析
作者说,韦斯特法尔教授的研究说明这些改革措施收效甚微,由此可知,他的态度是“怀疑的”,故选A)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3559921.html
相关试题推荐
StartupNuclearEnergyCompaniesAugurSafer,CheaperAtomicPowerA)N
StartupNuclearEnergyCompaniesAugurSafer,CheaperAtomicPowerA)N
StartupNuclearEnergyCompaniesAugurSafer,CheaperAtomicPowerA)N
StartupNuclearEnergyCompaniesAugurSafer,CheaperAtomicPowerA)N
StartupNuclearEnergyCompaniesAugurSafer,CheaperAtomicPowerA)N
LessNews,MuchBetterA)Inthepastfewdecades,thefortu
LessNews,MuchBetterA)Inthepastfewdecades,thefortu
LessNews,MuchBetterA)Inthepastfewdecades,thefortu
LessNews,MuchBetterA)Inthepastfewdecades,thefortu
LessNews,MuchBetterA)Inthepastfewdecades,thefortu
随机试题
[img]ct_epem_epelisv_00781(20097)[/img][br][originaltext]It’ssunnytoday.[/
Weshouldbeabletodothejobforyouquickly,______yougiveusallthenece
Amongthe21speciesofsharksassessedbySSG,[originaltext]Morethanhalf
GoingtothebeachismanyAmericans’favoriteactivity.IntheareanearNe
【S1】[br]【S4】is改成was这句是考一个句子前后时态要一致。主动词是said,那么教授过去说的话的内容也应该用过去时态(根据情况可能是一般过去时,
建筑安装工程费用中,脚手架工程费属于( )。A.措施项目费 B.直接工程费
具有腐蚀性的膏药是A.千捶膏 B.太乙膏 C.咬头膏 D.阳和解凝膏 E
气雾剂组成不包括A.滤器 B.抛射剂 C.阀门系统 D.射压容器 E.主
根据《历史文化名城名镇名村保护条例》,建设工程选址应当尽可能避开历史建筑;因特殊
某项目的净现金流量情况见下表,据此对该项目的投资状况做出评估。
最新回复
(
0
)