The military aspect of the United States Civil War has always attracted the

游客2024-02-16  5

问题     The military aspect of the United States Civil War has always attracted the most attention from scholars. The roar of gunfire, the massed movements of uniformed men, the shrill of bugles, and the drama of hand-to-hand combat have fascinated students of warfare for a century. Behind the lines, however, life was less spectacular. It was the story of back-breaking labor to provide the fighting men with food and arms, of nerve-tingling uncertainty about the course of national events, of heartbreak over sons or brothers or husbands lost in battle. If the men on the firing line won the victories, the means to those victories were forged on the home front.
    Never in the nation’s history had Americans worked harder for victory than in the Civil War.  Northerners and Southerners alike threw themselves into the task of supplying their respective armies.  Both governments made tremendous demands upon civilians and, in general, received willing cooperation.
    By 1863 the Northern war economy was rumbling along in high gear. Everything from steamboats to shovels was needed and produced. Denied Southern cotton, textile mills turned to wool for blankets and uniforms. Hides by the hundreds of thousands were turned into shoes and harness and saddles, ironworks manufactured locomotives, ordnance, armor plate.  Where private enterprise lagged, the government set up its own factories or arsenals. Agriculture boomed, with machinery doing the job of farm workers drawn into the army.
    In short, everything that a nation needed to fight a modern war was produced in uncounted numbers. Inevitably there were profiteers with gold-headed canes and flamboyant diamond stickpins, but for every crooked tycoon there were thousands of ordinary citizens living on fixed incomes who did their best to cope with rising prices and still make a contribution to the war effort. Those who could bought war bonds; others knitted, sewed, nursed, or lent any other assistance in their power. [br] Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the passage?

选项 A、The south lost the war partly because it lacked popular support.
B、The economy of the south was flexible enough to support the war efforts.
C、The North owed its victory partly to the adjustability of its economy.
D、The economic structure in the North hindered the logistics of the army.

答案 C

解析 推论题型。文中第三段对北方工业生产飞速发展的描写暗示其对赢得战争的影响。A项错。文章第二段中说南方人和北方人都积极投入政府的战争。B项中灵活调整经济支持战争的一方,根据文章第三段应是北方。错。D项,文中第三段第一句说北方军队需要的一切东西都得到生产。错。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3456886.html
最新回复(0)