首页
登录
职称英语
TV Linked to Lower MarksA)The effect of television on c
TV Linked to Lower MarksA)The effect of television on c
游客
2024-02-01
14
管理
问题
TV Linked to Lower Marks
A)The effect of television on children has been debated ever since the first sets were turned on. Now three new studies find that too much tube time can lower test scores, retard(妨碍)learning and even predict college performance. The reports appear in the July issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.
B)In the first report, researchers studied the effect that having a TV in a child’ s bedroom can have on third graders. "We looked at the household media environment in relation to academic achievement on mathematics, reading and language arts tests," said study author Dina Borzekowski, an assistant professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
C)Borzekowski and her colleague, Dr. Thomas Robinson of Stanford University, collected data on 386 third graders and their parents about how much TV the children watched, the number of TV sets, computers and video game consoles in the household and where they were. They also collected data on how much time the children spent using the different media, as well as the time spent doing homework and reading. The researchers found that the media in the household, where it is and how it is used can have a profound effect on learning. "We found that the household media environment has a very close association with performance on the different test scores," Borzekowski said.
D)"A child who has a TV in his or her bedroom is likely to have a score that is eight points lower on a mathematics test compared to a child who doesn’t have a TV in the bedroom," she noted. These children also scored lower on the reading and language arts tests. However, children who have access to a home computer are likely to have higher scores on each of the tests compared with children who don’t have access to a home computer, Borzekowski noted.
E)The reasons why TV has this negative effect are not clear, Borzekowski said. "When there’ s TV in the bedroom, parents are less likely to have control over the content and the amount watched," Borzekowski said. "They are also unable to know how early or how late the set is on. This seems to be associated with kids’ performance on academic tests." Borzekowski believes that content and the time the TV is on may be the primary reasons for its negative effect. "If the TV is in the family room, then parents can see the content of what children are watching," she said. "Parents can choose to sit alongside and watch, or turn the set off. A simple and straightforward, positive parenting strategy is to keep the TV out of the child’s bedroom, or remove it if it’s already there."
F)In the second report, Dr. Robert Hancox from the University of Otago in Dunedin, New Zealand, and colleagues found, regardless of your intelligence or social background, if you watch a lot of TV during childhood, you are a lot less likely to have a college degree by your mid-20s. In their study, the researchers followed 1,037 people born in 1972 and 1973. Every two years, between the ages of 5 and 15, they were asked how much television they watched. The researchers found that those who watched the most television during these years had earned fewer degrees by the time they were 26. "We found that the more television the child had watched, the more likely they were to leave school without any qualifications," Hancox said in a prepared statement. "Those who watched little television had the best chance of going on to university and earning a degree."
G)Hancox’s team found that watching TV at an early age had the most effect on graduating from college. "An interesting finding was that although teenage viewing was strongly linked to leaving school without any qualifications, it was earlier childhood viewing that had the greatest impact on getting a degree," he said. "This suggests that excessive television in younger children has a long-lasting adverse effect on educational performance."
H)In the third paper, Frederick Zimmerman and Dr. Dimitri Christakis from the University of Washington report that, for very young children, watching TV can result in lower test scores in mathematics, reading recognition and reading comprehension. "We looked at how much television children watched before age 3 and then at ages 3 to 5," Zimmerman said. "We found that for children who watched a small amount of TV in the earlier years, there was consider able beneficial effect compared to children who watched a lot of TV."
I)For children aged 3 to 5, the effect was not as clear, Zimmerman said. "There were some beneficial effects of watching TV on reading, but no beneficial effects for math or vocabulary," he noted. "The worst pattern was to watch more than three hours of TV before age 3. Those kids had a significant disadvantage compared to the other kids." Parents should follow the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation, which is no TV for children under 2, Zimmerman said. "Personally, I feel the cutoff should be children under 3, because there is just not any good content for children under 3."
J)One expert believes that TV can have both positive and negative effects, but it all depends on what children are watching. "Content matters," said Deborah Linebarger, an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania, who co-authored an accompanying editorial. "Educational content has been found to be related to performance on school readiness tests, higher grades when they are teenagers, whereas, non-educational content tends to be associated with lower academic performance."
K)Another expert agrees. "TV watching takes up space that could be used by more useful things," said Dr. Christopher Lucas, a clinical coordinator at the Early Childhood Evaluation and Treatment Program at the New York University Child Study Center. "TV is not necessarily toxic, but is something that has to be done in moderation: something that balances the other needs of the child for healthy development." L)Lucas puts the responsibility for how much TV kids watch and what they watch squarely on parents. "The amount of TV watching certainly has a link with the reduced amount of time reading or doing homework," he said. "The key is the amount of control parents have in limiting the amount of access. Get the TV out of the bedroom: be aware of what is being watched: limit the amount of TV watching." [br] The environment of family media greatly affects children’s test scores according to the first report.
选项
答案
C
解析
信息明示题。题干:第一则报告发现,家庭媒体环境极大地影响孩子的测试成绩。题干关键词是environment of family media。文中C段末句指出我们发现家庭媒体环境与孩子不同的测验分数的表现有密切的关系。故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3411428.html
相关试题推荐
Anewstudysuggeststhatthemoreteenagerswatchtelevision,themorelike
Anewstudysuggeststhatthemoreteenagerswatchtelevision,themorelike
Top10WaystoImproveYourCommunicationSkillsA)Effectivecom
Top10WaystoImproveYourCommunicationSkillsA)Effectivecom
Top10WaystoImproveYourCommunicationSkillsA)Effectivecom
Top10WaystoImproveYourCommunicationSkillsA)Effectivecom
Top10WaystoImproveYourCommunicationSkillsA)Effectivecom
Top10WaystoImproveYourCommunicationSkillsA)Effectivecom
[originaltext]Manytelevisionprogramsareveryrealistic.Onewhowatches
[originaltext]Manytelevisionprogramsareveryrealistic.Onewhowatches
随机试题
[audioFiles]2017m5s/audio_ezfj_131_201705[/audioFiles]TheOxfordandCambri
员工个人绩效的基本特征不包括( )A.绩效必须是可衡量的或可评估的 B.绩效
在一个媒介发达的时代,不少人觉得,图片才是传播的王道。髙速的时代应有高速的传播,
《义务教育数学课程标准(2011年版)》中有两类行为动词:一类描述结果目标的行为
(2016年真题)关于远期利率,以下说法错误的是()。A.是利率衍生品的定
关于药物基因组学说法正确的是A:药物基因组学研究人类基因变异和药物剂量关系的科学
根据以下资料。回答。 2006年全国共有生产力促进中心1331家,比上年增
在制订方案的环节,限定目标尤为重要。限定目标可以使用SMART方法,即具体性(
下列哪项不是动脉粥样硬化的高危因素? a.血浆总胆固醇增高b.血浆hdl增高
进行建设项目财务现金流量分析时,若采用的折现率提高,则()。A.净现金流量
最新回复
(
0
)