Airplane manufacturer: I object to your characterization of our X-387 jets as da

游客2024-01-13  6

问题 Airplane manufacturer: I object to your characterization of our X-387 jets as dangerous. No X-387 in commercial use has ever crashed or even had a serious malfunction. Airline regulator: The problem with the X-387 is not that it, itself, malfunctions, but that it creates a turbulence in its wake that can create hazardous conditions for aircraft in its vicinity. The airline regulator responds to the manufacturer by doing which of the following?

选项 A、Characterizing the manufacturer’s assertion as stemming from subjective interest rather than from objective evaluation of the facts.
B、Drawing attention to the fact that the manufacturer’s interpretation of the word "dangerous" is too narrow.
C、Invoking evidence that the manufacturer has explicitly dismissed as irrelevant to the point at issue.
D、Citing statistical evidence that refutes the manufacturer’s claim.
E、Casting doubt on the extent of the manufacturer’ s knowledge of the number of recent airline disasters.

答案 B

解析 这道两人对话题的问题目的设计与答案方向应引起我们的注意,它与我们在前面讲过的一道题目几乎完全一样:第一个人说:由于保险商所支付的钱大于其所得到的钱,因此保险对保险者是不利的。第二个人说:的确是这样,但由于保险商在得到保险后得到了平静的心态,因此保险对保险者有利。问题目的:第二个人如何响应第一个人所说?答案:第二个人指出第一个的理解太狭隘了。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3359002.html
最新回复(0)