2. 职称英语
  3. Critics maintain that the fiction of Herman Melville (1819-1891) has limitations

Critics maintain that the fiction of Herman Melville (1819-1891) has limitations

游客2024-01-12  73
问题 Critics maintain that the fiction of Herman Melville (1819-1891) has limitations, such as its lack of inventive plots after Moby-Dick (1851) and its occasionally inscrutable style. A more serious, yet problematic, charge is that Melville is a deficient writer because he is not a practitioner of the "art of fiction," as critics have conceived of this art since the late nineteenth-century essays and novels of Henry James. Indeed, most twentieth-century commentators regard Melville not as a novelist but as a writer of romance, since they believe that Melville’s fiction lacks the continuity that James viewed as essential to a novel: the continuity between what characters feel or think and what they do, and the continuity between characters’ fates and their pasts or original social classes. Critics argue that only Pierre (1852), because of its subject and its characters, is close to being a novel in the Jamesian sense.
    However, although Melville is not a Jamesian novelist, he is not therefore a deficient writer. A more reasonable position is that Melville is a different kind of writer, who held, and should be judged by, presuppositions about fiction that are quite different from James’s. It is true that Melville wrote "romances"; however, these are not the escapist fictions this word often implies, but fictions that range freely among very unusual or intense human experiences. Melville portrayed such experiences because he believed these best enabled him to explore moral questions, an exploration he assumed was the ultimate purpose of fiction. He was content to sacrifice continuity or even credibility as long as he could establish a significant moral situation. Thus Melville’s romances do not give the reader a full understanding of the complete feelings and thoughts that motivate actions and events that shape fate. Rather, the romances leave unexplained the sequence of events and either simplify or obscure motives. Again, such simplifications and obscurities exist in order to give prominence to the depiction of sharply delineated moral values, values derived from a character’s purely personal sense of honor, rather than, as in a Jamesian novel, from the conventions of society.  [br] The primary purpose of the passage is to
选项 A、make a case for the importance of skillful psychological motivation in well-written novels and romances
B、contrast the romantic and novelistic traditions and assert the aesthetic superiority of the romantic tradition
C、survey some of the responses to Melville’s fiction put forward by James and twentieth-century literary critics
D、argue that the charges made against Melville’s fiction by literary critics are suspect and misleading
E、note several accusations made against Melville’s fiction by literary critics and refute one of these accusations
答案 E
解析 Our goal is to find the primary purpose of the passage, which requires a firm understanding of the structure of the passage and its objectives. The passage notes various criticisms of Melville’s fiction, but its main argument is to support the idea that Melville’s fiction is valid even though it does not follow Henry James’s conception of the novel.
Furthermore, the passage defends Melville’s fiction by arguing that Melville had an equally valid conception of the purpose of fiction: one that differed fundamentally from that of James. The passage indicates that Melville’s strength does not derive from depictions of character motivation. Rather, it lies in Melville establishing a strong moral situation; occasionally this might be done at the expense of continuity or credibility.
A    The passage specifically refers to Melville’s novels and does not suggest that well-written novels or romances all share any particular characteristic.
B    The passage is specifically concerned with Melville’s novels, not the general romantic or novelistic traditions. Furthermore, the passage suggests that the romantic tradition in fiction has its own literary validity, as has the novelistic tradition, but does not indicate that one is superior to the other.
C    This passage does not simply give a survey of literary responses to Melville’s fiction; the passage goes further in arguing for the literary worth of Melville’s work.
D    Because the passage argues against certain criticisms of Melville’s work, it might be argued that the author of the passage considers some criticisms of Melville "suspect." However, there is nothing in the passage to imply this applies to all criticisms of Melville’s work. Furthermore, there is absolutely nothing in the passage to indicate that these critics’ work is "misleading."
E    Correct. The primary purpose of the passage is to counter one of several negative evaluations of Melville’s novels made by literary critics.
The correct answer is E.
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3357074.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)