Only since the late 1960s have literary scholars attempted to establish an a

游客2024-01-10  10

问题     Only since the late 1960s have literary scholars attempted to establish an accurate and systematic literary history of women novelists. Many previous histories suffered from “Great Traditionalism,” an approach that, by limiting itself to a group of women writers termed “great,” ignored the diversity among women novelists. These histories excluded the minor novelists, who are the links in the chain that binds literary generations together, and who allow us to see the continuities in women’s writing. Given the distortions produced by this concentration on “great” writers, as well as the obviously problematic tendency of many literary scholars to apply stereotypes of femininity, it was not surprising that some literary scholars in the early 1960s evaded the important issue of women’s sexual identity entirely, focusing instead on the form and style of women’s writing. Such an approach, while insightful and very valuable, did not consider the crucial connections between women’s writing and changes in their legal and economic status. [br] Information in the passage suggests that literary histories that adhere to “Great Traditionalism” have which of the following flaws?

选项 A、They overemphasize the issue of sexual identity in women’s writing.
B、They overemphasize the degree of continuity between literary generations.
C、They do not help to explain the connections between different generations of women novelists.
D、They denigrate the achievements of “great” female novelists in comparison with those of male novelists.
E、They do not incorporate the insights of literary histories produced before the late 1960s.

答案 C

解析 对应第三句“These histories excluded the minor novelists, who are the links in the chain that binds literary generations together, and who allow us to see the continuities in women’s writing.”既然这些二流作家是连接不同年代文学作品的链条以及可以让我们看到作品之间的连贯性,那么那些关注Great Traditionalism的学者肯定没有研究不同年代作品之间的关联,因此选项C正确。A项这些学者没有研究性别认同,更别说“过分强调”了。B项这些学者没有研究连贯性,更别说“过分强调”了。D项文中未提及男性。E项这些学者是1960年代早期的,不可能融合1960年代后期的历史,因此这也说不上是缺陷。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3349507.html
最新回复(0)