首页
登录
职称英语
"General Science Class" [img]2012q1/ct_etoefm_etoeflistz_1275_20121[/img] [br] W
"General Science Class" [img]2012q1/ct_etoefm_etoeflistz_1275_20121[/img] [br] W
游客
2024-01-04
46
管理
问题
"General Science Class"
[br] What can be concluded from information in this discussion?
Narrator: Listen to part of a discussion in a general science class.
Professor:
Okay, This is a general science course, and as such, the first thing I want you to understand is the Q46
scientific method. In your book, the definition of the scientific method is "an organized approach to
explaining observed facts, with a model of nature that must be tested, and then modified or discarded if it fails
to pass the tests." So let’s take that apart and talk about it. What are observed facts? Anyone?
Student 1: I’ll try.
Professor: Okay.
Student 1: Isn’t a fact supposed to be a statement that everyone agrees on?
Professor: So you would say that a fact is objectively true.
Student 1: Yeah. That’s what I mean. Professor:
Okay. That sounds good, but what about this... we consider it a fact that the Sun rises each morning
and the Earth rotates. But facts like that are not always agreed upon. Look, when we say that the Sun
rises each morning, we assume that it is the same Sun day after day—an idea that might not have been
accepted by ancient Egyptians, whose mythology taught them that the Sun died with every sunset and
was reborn with every sunrise. Now, let’s consider the case of the Earth’s rotation. Well, for most of
human history, the Earth was assumed to be stationary at the center of the universe. So, as you can Q47
see, our interpretations of facts often are based on beliefs about the world that others might not share.
Still, facts are the raw material that scientific models seek to explain, so it’s important that scientists
agree on the facts. How can we do that?
Student 2:
How about this... a fact has to be verified, I mean, that’s where the testing comes in, so we have to be
able to test a model, but we have to be able to test a fact, too, right?
Professor:
Now you’re on the right track. In the context of science, a fact must therefore be something that anyone
can verify for himself or herself, at least in principle. So, even though the interpretation may be different,
some interpretation of the Sun is there every morning, and that can be verified. Then, a model is
proposed to explain the facts. And a model is...
Student 3: ... an explanation of the facts.
Professor:
Right. Once the facts have been observed, a model can be proposed to explain them and not only
explain what is obvious but also make predictions that can be tested through further observations or
experiments. Let’s go back to Ptolemy’s model of the universe, which assumed that the Earth was the
center of everything. Okay, that was a useful model because it predicted future locations of the Sun,
Moon, and planets in the sky. However, although the Ptolemaic model remained in use for nearly 1500
years, eventually it became clear that its predictions didn’t quite match actual observations—a key
reason why the Earth-centered model of the universe finally was discarded.
Student 2: So models are discarded when they don’t match the observations. Q50
Professor:
Exactly. And new models are proposed to explain the facts in a better or more inclusive way. Okay, how
does a model achieve the status of a theory?
Student 1:
Well, I guess sometimes the model doesn’t fail, you know, it gets repeated by many experiments and
the, uh, the uh... pre-um, predictions are verified.
Professor:
So, when a prediction is verified...repeated, then we start to assume that the model is a valid
representation of nature, and when that happens with many experiments and a number of different
researchers, then the model achieves the status of a scientific theory.
Student 2: But...
Professor: Yes? Jerry?
Student 2: Well, the problem is that theories get discarded, too, don’t they? Professor:
Absolutely. Because it isn’t really possible to prove that a theory is true beyond all shadow of a doubt.
And that’s good because doubt is a cornerstone of science. Even a well-researched and presented
theory should undergo continuous challenges from the scientific community, with further observations and
experiments.
Student 3:
I’m sorry. Did we mention the term hypothesis? Does that fit in with a model or a theory?
Professor:
Glad you brought that up. A proposed model is often called a hypothesis, and that just means that the
scientist is making an educated guess that the model’s predictions will bear up under testing.
Student 3: So a hypothesis is a proposed model. Q48
Professor:
Right. But let’s put this all together, shall we? Step 1 is observation, the collection of data, that is,
observations. Step 2 is hypothesis or a model to explain the facts and to make predictions. Step 3 is additional
observations and experiments. And here’s the important part, when the predictions fail, then we
recognize that the model is flawed, and we have to revise or discard it, but when the predictions are verified
on a consistent basis, then we consider the possibility that we have a true representation of nature and
we elevate the model to the status of a theory.
Student:So step 4 is the theory?.
Professor:
Right. But, even then, the theory must undergo step 5... that’s further observations, experiments, and
challenges. Okay so far?... Okay. Now for a reality check. In the real world of science, discoveries are
rarely made by a process as... as mechanical as the idealized scientific method outlined in your text-
book... the one that we just summarized. For example, anyone recognize the name Johannes Kepler?
Student 2: Sure. Didn’t he propose the laws of planetary motion?
Professor:
He did, in about 1600. But instead of verifying new predictions on the basis of his model, he tested the Q49
model against observations that had been made previously. And... and...like most scientific Q51
discoveries, Kepler’s work involved intuition, collaboration with others, moments of insight, and luck. And
eventually, other scientists made a lot of observations to, uh... verify the planetary positions predicted
by his model.
Student 1: Student 2:
So the... ...Then
Student 2: Go ahead.
Student 1: So the scientific method in the book... that’s not really the way it happens a lot of the time? Professor:
Okay, let’s put it this way... the scientific method is a process that we need to keep in mind as we do
the work of scientists, but we should also understand that it’s an idealized process for making objective
judgments about whether a proposed model of nature is close to the truth. And we should also keep in
mind that in the work of scientists, other factors are also brought to bear on those ideal steps in the
process.
选项
A、A model does not always reflect observations.
B、A model is not subject to change like a theory is.
C、A model is considered true without doubt.
D、A model does not require further experimentation.
答案
A
解析
A model does not always reflect observations.
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3332832.html
相关试题推荐
IntheUnitedStates,(the)attorneygeneralisacabinet(member)incharge(wi
Generally,inordertobepreservedinthefossilrecord,organismsmust
Haresgenerallyhavelongerearsandhindlegsthanrabbitsandmovebyjumping
The(conceptual)of(musical)harmonyis(generally)tracedtotheninthcentury
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasofte
随机试题
Whatisthereportmainlyabout?[originaltext]Insportsnewstoday,Blackbu
高强度螺栓施工时,对每一个连接接头,应先用临时螺栓和冲钉定位,临时螺栓和冲钉的数
综合布线系统中水平子系统线缆的长度限制为( )米。A.150 B.120
某饱和土样的天然含水率ω=20%,土粒比重Gs=2.75,该土样的孔隙比为(
A.激发光B.发射光C.两者均有D.两者均无荧光分析法
在住宅项目价格制定过程中,合理的()是确保价格实现的关键。A.市场调研 B
图示多跨梁由AC和CB铰接而成,自重不计。已知:q=10kN/m,M=40kN/
甘味药的作用是A.发散、行气、行血 B.补益、缓急止痛、调和药性、和中 C.
给水与污水处理厂正式运行前必须进行全厂试运行,其目的有()。A.对土建工程和设
下列哪项属于非感染性发热() A.风湿热 B.大叶性肺炎发热 C.细菌性痢
最新回复
(
0
)