首页
登录
职称英语
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeav
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeav
游客
2023-12-26
26
管理
问题
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, taxpayers who wish to should be able to read about it without further expense. And science advances through cross-fertilization between projects. Barriers to that exchange slow it down.
There is a widespread feeling that the journal publishers who have mediated this exchange for the past century or more are becoming an impediment to it. One of the latest converts is the British government. Recently it announced that, the results of taxpayer-financed research would be available, free and online, for anyone to read and redistribute.
Britain’s government is not alone. Soon the European Union followed suit. In the U.S., the National Institutes of Health (NIH, the single biggest source of civilian research funds in the world) has required open-access publishing since 2008. And the Wellcome Trust, a British foundation that is the world’s second-biggest charitable source of scientific money, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also insists that those who receive its support should make their work available free.
Criticism of journal publishers usually boils down to two things. One is that their processes take months, when the Internet could enable them to take days. The other is that because each paper is like a mini-monopoly, which workers in the field have to read if they are to advance their own research, there is no incentive to keep the price down. The publishers thus have scientists — or, more accurately, their universities, which pay the subscriptions — in an armlock. That, combined with the fact that the raw material (manuscripts of papers) is free, leads to generous returns. In 2011, Elsevier, a large Dutch publisher, made a profit of £768 million on revenues of £2.06 billion — a margin of 37 percent. Indeed, Elsevier’s profits are thought so
egregious
by many people that 12,000 researchers have signed up to boycott the company’s journals.
Publishers do provide a service. They organize peer reviews, in which papers are criticized anonymously by experts (though those experts, like the authors of papers, are seldom paid for what they do). They also sort the scientific sheep from the goats, by deciding what gets published, and where. That gives the publishers huge power. Since researchers, administrators and grant-awarding bodies all take note of which work has got through this filtering mechanism, the competition to publish in the best journals is intense, and the system becomes self-reinforcing, increasing the value of those journals still further.
But not, perhaps, for much longer. Support has been swelling for open-access scientific publishing: doing it online, in a way that allows anyone to read papers free of charge. The movement started among scientists themselves, but governments are paying attention and asking whether they might also benefit from the change.
Much remains to be worked out. Some fear the loss of the traditional journals’ curation and verification of research. Even Sir Mark Walport, the director of the Wellcome Trust and a fierce advocate of open-access publication, worries that the newly liberated papers have ended up in different places rather than being consolidated in the way they want.
A revolution, then, has begun. Technology permits it; researchers and politicians want it. If scientific publishers are not trembling in their boots, they should be. [br] According to the passage, people who are unhappy with publishers of scientific journals______.
选项
A、criticize the unfair publication of scientific articles
B、object to their slowness and the high costs of the journals
C、blame them for the slow pace of recent scientific progress
D、think that journals should be abolished as an obstacle to freedom of speech
答案
B
解析
细节题。根据题干关键词定位第4段第1句,从后文可知批评集中在两点:出版时间长达数月;垄断造成价格难以下降。故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3305998.html
相关试题推荐
以民主、包容、合作、共赢的精神实现共同安全,做到一国内部的事情一国自主办、大家共同的事情大家商量办。Weshouldworkforcommonsecu
我们应大力推进流动人口基本公共服务均等化,让流动人口在城镇获得均等的生存和发展机会。Weshouldmakesurethatmigratedpopu
应减少贸易保护,加强对最不发达国家农业技术、资金等支持,提高全球农业生产水平和粮食安全保障水平。Effortsshouldbemadetocurbt
哪怕有整面墙壁供涂鸦者乱涂乱画,也阻止不了他们弄脏其他地方。(impede;dirtyup)Entirewallsavailableforgraffi
坚持通过对话和协商,以和平方式解决国际争端。Weshouldseekpeacefulsettlementofinternationaldisput
Weshouldletmoreyoungparentsandtheirchildrencanenjoyscientificearlye
Lifeinsurance,beforeavailableonlytoyoung,healthypersons,cannowbeobta
Primitivesuperstitionsthatfeedracismshouldbe______througheducation.A、ig
Asia’sfirstdemocracy—acountrythathasafreelyelectedgovernment—was__
Weshouldnot______theWest,norshouldwepraiseittotheskiesandthinkgr
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Letmecleanyourwindshieldandcheckyourwaterandyouwill
EveryyearmorethanhalfamillionAmericankidshavedrainage(排泄)tubessurgic
在信用卡支付方式中,( )是通过第三方代理人支付的。A.账号直接传输方式 B
相关关系是指变量与变量之间存在着一种确定性的数量依存关系。()
根据《水工建筑物地下开挖工程施工技术规范》SL378-2007,下列关于洞室开挖
反映肾小管功能损害最敏感的酶是A.LDB.触酶C.尿溶菌酶D.尿N-乙酰-β-D
患者,男性,66岁,肺癌晚期化疗,口腔颊黏膜上有白色斑块,怀疑真菌感染。为该患者
将14.005和1000.501分别化为4位有效数字,正确的结果是()。
在探究服务对象不能解决问题的原因时,社会工作者应该注意的因素主要包括()。A.
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
最新回复
(
0
)