首页
登录
职称英语
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United St
游客
2023-12-25
43
管理
问题
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, have constructed dams to store water and to generate electricity. Building these dams provided cheap electricity, created jobs for workers, stimulated regional economic development, and allowed farming on lands that would otherwise be too dry. But not everyone agrees that big dam projects are entirely beneficial. Their storage reservoirs stop the flow of rivers and often submerge towns, farms, and historic sites. They prevent fish migrations and change aquatic habitats essential for native species.
The tide may have turned, in fact, against dam building. In 1998 the Army Corps announced that it would no longer be building large dams. In the few remaining sites where dams might be built, public opposition is so great that getting approval for projects is unlikely. Instead, the new focus may be on removing existing dams and restoring natural habitats. In 1999 Bruce Babbitt, the then United States interior secretary, said, —Of the 75,000 large dams in the United States, most were built a long time ago and are now
obsolete
and unsafe. They were built with no consideration of the environmental costs. As operating licenses come up for renewal, dam removal and habitat restoration to original stream flows will be among the options considered.
The first active hydroelectric dam in the United States to be removed against the wishes of its owners was the 162-year-old Edwards Dam, on the Kennebec River in Augusta, Maine. For many years, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service had advocated the removal of this dam, which prevented migration of salmon, shad, sturgeon, and other fish species up the river. In a precedent-setting decision, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam removed after concluding that the environmental and economic benefits of a free-flowing river outweighed the electricity generated by the dam. In July 1999 the dam was removed and restoration work began on wetlands and stream banks long underwater.
The next dams likely to be taken down are the Elwha and Glines Dams on the Elwha River in Olympic National Park in the state of Washington. Built nearly a century ago to provide power to lumber and paper mills in the town of Port Angeles, these dams blocked access to upstream spawning beds for six species of salmon on what once was one of the most productive salmon rivers in the world. Simply removing the dams will not restore the salmon, however. Where 50-kilogram king salmon once fought their way up waterfalls to lay their eggs in gravel beds, there now are only concrete walls holding back still water and deep beds of muddy deposits. Removing the mud, uncovering gravel beds where fish spawn, and finding suitable salmon types to rebuild the population is a daunting task. Congress will have to appropriate somewhere around $300 to $400 million to remove these two relatively small dams and rehabilitate the area.
Environmental groups, encouraged by these examples, have begun to talk about much more ambitious projects. Four giant dams on the Snake River in Washington State, for example, might be removed to restore salmon and steelhead fish runs to the headwaters of the Columbia River. The Hetch Hetchy Dam in Yosemite National Park might be taken down to reveal what John Muir, the founder of the prestigious environmental organization Sierra Club, called a valley—just as beautiful and worthy of preservation as the majestic Yosemite. Some groups have even suggested removing the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. In each of these cases, powerful interests stand in opposition. These dams generate low-cost electricity and store water that is needed for agriculture and industry. Local economies, domestic water supplies, and certain types of recreation all would be severely impacted by destruction of these dams. [br] The word suitable in Paragraph 4 is closest in meaning to________.
选项
A、new
B、healthy
C、appropriate
D、similar
答案
C
解析
题干suitable意为“合适的”,而C项appropriate意思是“适当的”,两者是近义词,故正确答案为C项。A项“新的”、B项“健康的”、D项“相似的”均不符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3304427.html
相关试题推荐
HowmuchmoneydoestheUnitedStatesintendtoprovidetobuildsecondaryschoo
Whatisasuperbug?[originaltext]Every15minutes,someoneintheUnitedSt
Itwasduringthe21stcenturythataveragepeoplewereabletoundertaketravel
Theworstoutcomesofclimatechangeincludethelossofnearlyallcoralreefs
Inordertoregister,peoplehadtounderstandtheConstitutionoftheUnitedSt
TheUnitedStatesPostalService,orUSPS,hasbeguntestswithself-drivingtru
Starbucksopenedmanypick-upstoresintheUnitedStatesforonlineorders.A、正确
DiningroomsaredisappearingfromrestaurantsintheUnitedStates,asmoreand
WhenevertheUnitedStatesgovernmentoranyofficeroragencythereofshallpro
InnearlyeverycasethefirstblackBritonstomovetotheUKdidsooftheiro
随机试题
(1)Saintsshouldalwaysbejudgedguiltyuntiltheyareprovedinnocent,but
Heisa(n)________characterwholikeswearingaberetanddarkglasses.A、eccent
储罐区低倍移动式泡沫系统是指用水带将消防车或机动消防泵、泡沫比例混合装置、移动式
()的假设起源于享乐主义,认为人的行为就是为了获得最大的经济利益,工作的目的是
当框架各杆同时有温度升高时,图示结构中不会产生内力的是()。A. B.
因果分析图的绘制是从“结果”开始绘制。()
下列哪种成分可随水蒸气蒸馏A.苯醌B.蒽酯C.三萜皂苷D.强心苷E.多糖
血源性肺脓肿病人,突发左胸痛,继之出现呼吸困难、发绀伴大汗。查体:气管右移,左肺
某工业园区规划设计项目招标,招标人选派园区管委会的总工程师和总经济师进入评标委员
甲产品单位直接材料成本为10元,单位直接人工成本为6元,单位变动性制造费用为4元
最新回复
(
0
)