首页
登录
职称英语
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career dipl
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career dipl
游客
2023-12-25
17
管理
问题
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy, he conceded, but the Middle Kingdom was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power", or cultural influence and attractiveness.
Indeed, soft power is generally seen as a major asset in the foreign policy realm, helping countries achieve their goals without resorting to "hard power"—i.e.,
coercive
means. "Young people around the world," the diplomat confidently asserted, "still listen to American music, watch American movies and dream of coming to the United States."
Particularly in Latin America, that remains as true as ever, despite Donald Trump in the White House and a historic and irreversible shift of economic power away from the West towards Asia. The United States’ cultural influence and visibility stands unrivaled across Latin America. Chinese culture, by comparison, remains largely unknown and is usually met with indifference and a lack of interest. While some people are aware of China’s growing economic role in Latin America—it is already the largest trading partner of several of the region’s major economies, including Brazil, Chile and Peru—most would struggle to name a single Chinese contemporary singer, athlete or soap opera star. Latin America’s mass media busily reports even minor events in U.S. politics or cultural life, yet Chinese news remain the stuff of specialists.
Yet while U.S. soft power may provide some tangible economic benefits in Latin America—think of tourism to Disney World and New York, Netflix subscriptions and Starbucks sales—it has also shown to be a double-edged sword, particularly in the foreign policy realm. China’s
under-the-radar
approach in Latin America, by comparison, also brings important advantages, some of which may, paradoxically, be of greater strategic relevance in the long term. That is because, in a region traditionally concerned about U.S. meddling, strong cultural influence tends to inflate the perceived political and economic influence. While the United States’ de facto influence in Latin America has declined significantly over the past decade—partly due to China’s growing role in the region, but also because U.S. policymakers generally do not see the region as a priority—this change is barely reflected in the public debate, where the U.S. role remains outsized.
That often makes cooperating with the United States politically costly. When Brazil’s former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso reached, in 2000, a groundbreaking space cooperation deal with the United States, which would involve U.S. use of the Brazilian space agency’s launch site in Alcantara in Northern Brazil (its equatorial location allows reducing fuel costs of satellite launches by 30 percent), the opposition saw an opportunity to whip up anti-American nationalist sentiment by mischaracterizing the technology safeguards agreement (TSA) as a threat to Brazil’s sovereignty. Cardoso found himself accused of being an entreguista and canceled the project, which would have allowed Brazil to develop precious expertise in the area—increasingly important due to strong growth in the microsatellite sector crucial for GPS and internet communication. When the current government of Michel Temer took up the project recently, pressure again intensified, even though this time its successful conclusion is more likely. If the project partner had been China back then or today, it seems unlikely that the project would have faced as much political resistance.
This episode is starkly contrasted by how China can operate across Latin America and make strategic investments almost without any real concern for public opinion. When Chinese investors recently bought a third of Brazil’s electricity sector—a sector of tremendous strategic importance—the news barely made it to the front page of Brazilian newspapers. [br] The main idea of Paragraph 5 is that________.
选项
A、the U.S. cooperation with Latin American countries often encounters political resistance
B、the space cooperation between the United States and Brazil is likely to succeed
C、the U.S. is unwilling to cooperate with Brazil in space exploration
D、China is willing to cooperate with Brazil in space exploration
答案
A
解析
主旨题。该题为段落主旨题,关键在于找出中心句,而段落中心句一般位于段首。分析第5段结构可知,第1句(那常常使得与美国合作的政治代价高昂)为中心句,接着举了两个例子说明该句观点,故正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3303977.html
相关试题推荐
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherat
Someobserverssaytherecentcoupofamilitarygovernmentinthatcountrywill
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherat
Recentstudieshaveidentifiedfourmajorglobalenvironmentalrisks;acidrain,
Hisinabilitytolearnforeignlanguageswasa(n)obstacletohiscareer.A、barrie
TheforeignministerwouldrevealnothingabouthisrecenttouroftheMiddleEa
AlthoughthisbookclaimstobeabiographyofGeorgeWashington,manyofthein
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherat
Acourt-martialhasbutrecentlydecidedtoacquithim.A、declareheisnotguilt
Iknewnothingofthemotivesbehindhisrecentmove,andIdon’tknoweitherth
随机试题
Butcollegehasneverbeenabletoworkitsmagicforeveryone.A、但是大学不是对每一个人产生它的
Fishareanimalsthatliveinwater.Theyliveinalmostanyplace【B1】______
Massivechangesinalloftheworld’sdeeplycherishedsportinghabitsareu
A.肠腔狭窄和充盈缺损征 B."杯口征" C."鸟嘴征" D."鹅卵石征"
在澳大利亚,下列做法正确的是( )。A.竖大拇指对别人表示称赞 B.送兔子给
脑出血与蛛网膜下腔出血的区别主要在于()A.有无偏瘫 B.有无昏迷 C
某消化性溃疡患者即将出院,责任护士指导其回家后应注意的问题不包括( )。A.生
某女性患者,26岁。缺失多年,余留牙均正常,咬合关系正常,缺隙龈距正常。该患者
(2017年真题)某工程有3个施工过程,依次为:钢筋→模板→混凝土,划分为Ⅰ和Ⅱ
为防止发生事故,国家对危险化学品的运输有严格的要求,下列关于化学品运输安全要求的
最新回复
(
0
)