首页
登录
职称英语
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career dipl
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career dipl
游客
2023-12-25
22
管理
问题
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy, he conceded, but the Middle Kingdom was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power", or cultural influence and attractiveness.
Indeed, soft power is generally seen as a major asset in the foreign policy realm, helping countries achieve their goals without resorting to "hard power"—i.e.,
coercive
means. "Young people around the world," the diplomat confidently asserted, "still listen to American music, watch American movies and dream of coming to the United States."
Particularly in Latin America, that remains as true as ever, despite Donald Trump in the White House and a historic and irreversible shift of economic power away from the West towards Asia. The United States’ cultural influence and visibility stands unrivaled across Latin America. Chinese culture, by comparison, remains largely unknown and is usually met with indifference and a lack of interest. While some people are aware of China’s growing economic role in Latin America—it is already the largest trading partner of several of the region’s major economies, including Brazil, Chile and Peru—most would struggle to name a single Chinese contemporary singer, athlete or soap opera star. Latin America’s mass media busily reports even minor events in U.S. politics or cultural life, yet Chinese news remain the stuff of specialists.
Yet while U.S. soft power may provide some tangible economic benefits in Latin America—think of tourism to Disney World and New York, Netflix subscriptions and Starbucks sales—it has also shown to be a double-edged sword, particularly in the foreign policy realm. China’s
under-the-radar
approach in Latin America, by comparison, also brings important advantages, some of which may, paradoxically, be of greater strategic relevance in the long term. That is because, in a region traditionally concerned about U.S. meddling, strong cultural influence tends to inflate the perceived political and economic influence. While the United States’ de facto influence in Latin America has declined significantly over the past decade—partly due to China’s growing role in the region, but also because U.S. policymakers generally do not see the region as a priority—this change is barely reflected in the public debate, where the U.S. role remains outsized.
That often makes cooperating with the United States politically costly. When Brazil’s former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso reached, in 2000, a groundbreaking space cooperation deal with the United States, which would involve U.S. use of the Brazilian space agency’s launch site in Alcantara in Northern Brazil (its equatorial location allows reducing fuel costs of satellite launches by 30 percent), the opposition saw an opportunity to whip up anti-American nationalist sentiment by mischaracterizing the technology safeguards agreement (TSA) as a threat to Brazil’s sovereignty. Cardoso found himself accused of being an entreguista and canceled the project, which would have allowed Brazil to develop precious expertise in the area—increasingly important due to strong growth in the microsatellite sector crucial for GPS and internet communication. When the current government of Michel Temer took up the project recently, pressure again intensified, even though this time its successful conclusion is more likely. If the project partner had been China back then or today, it seems unlikely that the project would have faced as much political resistance.
This episode is starkly contrasted by how China can operate across Latin America and make strategic investments almost without any real concern for public opinion. When Chinese investors recently bought a third of Brazil’s electricity sector—a sector of tremendous strategic importance—the news barely made it to the front page of Brazilian newspapers. [br] The main idea of Paragraph 5 is that________.
选项
A、the U.S. cooperation with Latin American countries often encounters political resistance
B、the space cooperation between the United States and Brazil is likely to succeed
C、the U.S. is unwilling to cooperate with Brazil in space exploration
D、China is willing to cooperate with Brazil in space exploration
答案
A
解析
主旨题。该题为段落主旨题,关键在于找出中心句,而段落中心句一般位于段首。分析第5段结构可知,第1句(那常常使得与美国合作的政治代价高昂)为中心句,接着举了两个例子说明该句观点,故正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3303977.html
相关试题推荐
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherat
Someobserverssaytherecentcoupofamilitarygovernmentinthatcountrywill
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherat
Recentstudieshaveidentifiedfourmajorglobalenvironmentalrisks;acidrain,
Hisinabilitytolearnforeignlanguageswasa(n)obstacletohiscareer.A、barrie
TheforeignministerwouldrevealnothingabouthisrecenttouroftheMiddleEa
AlthoughthisbookclaimstobeabiographyofGeorgeWashington,manyofthein
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherat
Acourt-martialhasbutrecentlydecidedtoacquithim.A、declareheisnotguilt
Iknewnothingofthemotivesbehindhisrecentmove,andIdon’tknoweitherth
随机试题
Likeaneedleclimbingupabathroomscale,thenumberkeepsrising.In1991
范晔《张衡传》原文 张衡,字平子,南阳西鄂人也。衡少善属文
信息比率是单位跟踪误差所对应的()。A.超额收益 B.绝对收益 C.相
心悸,面色淡白,失眠健忘,舌淡,其临床意义是A.心气虚证 B.心血虚证 C.
关于重(装)量差异叙述错误的是A.用于片剂、胶囊剂等制剂检查B.属于制剂通则检查
纺车之于()相当于()之于联合收割机A.手摇;蒸汽机 B.织布;传动带
陈洪林是一名初三学生,父母离异,他和父亲一起生活,母亲没来看过他。陈洪林性格比较
公开发行证券的公司信息披露规范不包括()。A:编报规则 B:内容与格式准则
某企业有A、B两个食堂,开学第一天A食堂就餐人数为8000,但其中20%在第二天
下列关于股指期货在战略性资产配置中的应用的描述,正确的有()。A.在战略资产
最新回复
(
0
)